AI Article Synopsis

  • The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is a new diagnostic tool for assessing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by measuring intragastric pressure during endoscopy.
  • A study investigated the link between EPSIS results and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function, comparing EPSIS with high-resolution manometry (HRM).
  • The findings revealed that EPSIS parameters, such as pressure difference and pressure gradient, are significantly correlated with LES pressures, supporting its effectiveness as a diagnostic tool for GERD.

Article Abstract

The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS), a novel diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), allows evaluation of the anti-reflux barrier using endoscopy by monitoring the intragastric pressure (IGP) during insufflation. In this study, we evaluated the association between EPSIS results and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function measured by high-resolution manometry (HRM) to elucidate whether EPSIS can evaluate the LES function. A retrospective, single-center study of patients with GERD symptoms who underwent endoscopy, pH-impedance monitoring, EPSIS, and HRM was conducted. The primary outcome was basal LES pressure and the secondary outcomes were end-respiratory LES pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). As EPSIS parameters, the following were measured: 1) pressure difference (mmHg), the difference between maximum and basal IGP; and 2) pressure gradient (mmHg/s), calculated by dividing pressure difference by the insufflating time. Pressure difference < 4.7 mmHg or pressure gradient < 0.07 mmHg/s was defined as an EPSIS GERD pattern. Forty-seven patients (median age: 53 years, 37 female) were analyzed. Pressure difference and pressure gradient significantly correlated with basal LES pressure (ρ = 0.29; 0.04 and ρ = 0.29; 0.04). Patients with EPSIS GERD pattern showed significantly lower basal LES pressure [13.2 (4.8-26.6) vs 25.3 (10.4-66.7) mmHg, 0.002], lower end-respiratory LES pressure [8.5 (1.1-15.9) vs 15.5 (1.9-43.9) mmHg, 0.019] and lower IRP [5.9 (1.0-12.0) vs 9.8 (1.3-17.8) mmHg, 0.020]. This study showed a close association between EPSIS results and LES pressures measured by HRM. This indicates that EPSIS can evaluate the LES function during endoscopy and endorse the role of EPSIS as a diagnostic tool for GERD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187419PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1790-6141DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pressure
10
endoscopic pressure
8
pressure study
8
study integrated
8
integrated system
8
system epsis
8
high-resolution manometry
8
les function
8
les pressure
8
pressure difference
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!