AI Article Synopsis

  • * A retrospective study analyzed data from 42 pediatric patients treated with either bivalirudin or UFH between 2016-2020, focusing on outcomes related to bleeding and thrombotic complications.
  • * Results indicated that bivalirudin is associated with significantly lower rates of major bleeding complications compared to UFH, while rates of major thrombotic events did not significantly differ between the two anticoagulants.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is being increasingly used for anticoagulation in children after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. While the data on bivalirudin use in pulsatile flow VADs are growing, reports on its use in patients on continuous flow (CF) VAD as well as comparisons of associated outcomes with unfractionated heparin (UFH) remain limited.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single tertiary-quaternary referral center.

Patients: All patients less than 21 years old on CF-VAD support who received bivalirudin or UFH for anticoagulation between the years 2016 and 2020.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Measurements And Main Results: Clinical characteristics compared between the cohorts included time to target range of anticoagulation, markers of hemolysis, and prevalence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events such as major hemorrhagic complications, ischemic stroke, and pump thrombosis. In 42 unique patients (41 HeartWare HVAD [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN], one HeartMate 3 LVAD [Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL]) during the study period, a total of 67 encounters of IV anticoagulation infusions (29 UFH and 38 bivalirudin) were retrospectively reviewed. In comparison with use of UFH, bivalirudin was associated with lesser odds of major bleeding complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; p = 0.038). We failed to identify any difference in odds of major thrombotic complications (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 0.47-13.59; p = 0.450). Eight of the patients (28%) on UFH were switched to bivalirudin due to hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications or inability to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation, while two of the patients (5%) on bivalirudin were switched to UFH due to hemorrhagic complications. Bivalirudin was used for a "washout" in eight cases with concern for pump thrombosis-six had resolution of the pump thrombosis, while two needed pump exchange.

Conclusions: Use of bivalirudin for anticoagulation in patients on CF-VAD support was associated with lesser odds of hemorrhagic complications compared with use of UFH. Bivalirudin "washout" was successful in medical management of six of eight cases of possible pump thrombosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hemorrhagic complications
12
pump thrombosis
12
ufh bivalirudin
12
bivalirudin
11
unfractionated heparin
8
patients continuous
8
continuous flow
8
ventricular assist
8
assist device
8
retrospective cohort
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!