Dilemma of Supra- or Infrapatellar Tibial Nailing: Anterior Knee Pain vs. Intra-Articular Damage.

Aim: Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for tibial fractures, and a suprapatellar method has been described to prevent common problems associated with the typical infrapatellar IMN technique, such as anterior knee pain. However, in the suprapatellar technique, injury to intra-articular structures is a concern. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of suprapatellar and infrapatellar IMN in terms of union, complications, and function.

Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 61 patients who had undergone suprapatellar ( = 29, Group A) or infrapatellar ( = 31, Group B) tibial IMN was conducted. For the suprapatellar group, magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired on the sixth month follow-up. Complications, radiological findings, functional outcomes, surgery duration, and differences in a range of motion (ROM) were compared.

Results: Surgery duration was significantly shorter in Group A (81 mins vs. 107 mins, < 0.001), and visual analog scale (VAS) values were significantly higher in Group B (0.17 vs. 1.62, < 0.001). In Group A, the patients' Lysholm scores were significantly higher (95.6 vs. 92, =0.006). In terms of anterior knee pain, none was experienced in Group A (0%), while 11 patients (26.1%) reported about it in Group B. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in SF-36 score (=0.925), the radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures score (=0.454), union time (=0.110), or ROM (=0.691). In Group A, two cases of patellofemoral cartilage degeneration were observed.

Conclusion: If performed with sufficient expertise, the suprapatellar IMN technique is a safe, reliable technique with a low frequency of anterior knee pain for treating tibial fractures. There is no clear evidence that it causes damage to intra-articular structures. The possibility of patellofemoral cartilage degeneration due to this technique should be further evaluated by prospective studies including pre- and postoperative radiologic assessments.