Third-party punishment of antisocial others is unique to humans and seems to be universal across cultures. However, its emergence in ontogeny remains unknown. We developed a participatory cognitive paradigm using gaze-contingency techniques, in which infants can use their gaze to affect agents displayed on a monitor. In this paradigm, fixation on an agent triggers the event of a stone crushing the agent. Throughout five experiments (total N = 120), we show that eight-month-old infants punished antisocial others. Specifically, infants increased their selective looks at the aggressor after watching aggressive interactions. Additionally, three control experiments excluded alternative interpretations of their selective gaze, suggesting that punishment-related decision-making influenced looking behaviour. These findings indicate that a disposition for third-party punishment of antisocial others emerges in early infancy and emphasize the importance of third-party punishment for human cooperation. This behavioural tendency may be a human trait acquired over the course of evolution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489529 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01354-2 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The social welfare effect of e-commerce product reputation information asymmetry from the perspective of network externality.
PLoS One
January 2025
Business School, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
Reputation is the most important intangible asset of merchants. In the e-commerce platform market, reputation information has become an important signal of product quality. However, with increasingly fierce competition among merchants on these platforms, violations of reputation information, such as "click farming," "cash rebate for favorable comments," and "pay per click," have caused information asymmetry and adverse selection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBeyond punishment: psychological foundations of restorative interventions.
Trends Cogn Sci
December 2024
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Work on the psychology of justice has largely focused on punishment. However, punishment is not our only strategy for dealing with conflict. Rather, emerging work suggests that people often respond to transgressions by compensating victims, involving third-party mediators, and engaging in forgiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEXPRESS: COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE PROCESSES IN CHILDREN'S THIRD-PARTY PUNISHMENT.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
December 2024
Oxford Brookes University, Centre for Psychological Research Sinclair, Headington Rd, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, United Kingdom.
This study investigated how children's punishment affective states change over time, as well as when children begin to prioritise intentions over outcomes in their punishment decisions. Whereas most prior research sampled children from Anglo-America or Northwestern Europe, we tested 5- to 11-year-old children from Colombia and Spain (N = 123). We focused on punishment behaviour in response to ostensibly real moral transgressions, rather than punishment recommendations for hypothetical moral transgressions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProbing the Causal Contribution of Reasoning to Third-Party Moral Judgment of Harm Transgressions.
Exp Psychol
July 2024
CLLE, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès & CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Recent work has supported the role of reasoning in third-party moral judgment of harm transgressions. In particular, reasoning may increase the weight of intention in moral judgment, especially following accidental harm, a situation that presumably requires judges to balance considerations about the outcome endured by a victim on the one hand and considerations about an agent's intention to cause harm on the other hand. Three preregistered lab-based studies aimed to test the causal contribution of reasoning to moral judgment of harm transgressions using experimental manipulations borrowed from the reasoning literature: time pressure (Experiment 1), cognitive load (Experiment 2), and priming (Experiment 3).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe development of cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement in children and adolescents: The role of in-group favoritism.
Acta Psychol (Amst)
November 2024
Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China; Laboratory of Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China. Electronic address:
Various scholars have discussed the influence of group membership on cooperative behaviors in adult samples. Nonetheless, the developmental trajectories of related biases from middle childhood and early adolescence remain to be explored. Using the one-shot 4-player public goods game and inducing group membership awareness by school affiliation, we investigated the effects of group membership of imaginary partners on cooperation (Experiment 1) and cooperative norm enforcement (Experiment 2) in children and adolescents across fourth (N = 106, Mage = 9.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!