AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) in patients with HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) while receiving systemic therapies.
  • It involves a review of 46 patients treated at a single institution from 2013 to 2018, with 28 patients (60.9%) developing RN within a year post-SRS.
  • Results indicate that those who developed RN were more likely to have received multiple HER2-directed therapies during their treatment compared to those who did not develop RN, suggesting a potential correlation between systemic therapy type and timing with RN risk.

Article Abstract

Background: There is a concern that HER2-directed systemic therapies, when administered concurrently with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), may increase the risk of radiation necrosis (RN). This study explores the impact of timing and type of systemic therapies on the development of RN in patients treated with SRS for HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBrM).

Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study including patients >18 years of age with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS between 2013 and 2018 and with at least 12-month post-SRS follow-up. Presence of RN was determined imaging at one-year post-SRS, with confirmation by biopsy in some patients. Demographics, radiotherapy parameters, and timing ("during" defined as four weeks pre- to four weeks post-SRS) and type of systemic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, HER2-directed) were evaluated.

Results: Among 46 patients with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS, 28 (60.9%) developed RN and 18 (39.1%) did not based on imaging criteria. Of the 11 patients who underwent biopsy, 10/10 (100%) who were diagnosed with RN on imaging were confirmed to be RN positive on biopsy and 1/1 (100%) who was not diagnosed with RN was confirmed to be RN negative on biopsy. Age (mean 53.3 vs 50.4 years, respectively), radiotherapy parameters (including total dose, fractionation, CTV and size target volume, all >0.05), and receipt of any type of systemic therapy during SRS (60.7% vs 55.6%, =0.97) did not differ between patients who did or did not develop RN. However, there was a trend for patients who developed RN to have received more than one agent of HER2-directed therapy independent of SRS timing compared to those who did not develop RN (75.0% vs 44.4%, =0.08). Moreover, a significantly higher proportion of those who developed RN received more than one agent of HER2-directed therapy SRS treatment compared to those who did not develop RN (35.7% vs 5.6%, =0.047).

Conclusions: Patients with HER2 BCBrM who receive multiple HER2-directed therapies during SRS for BCBrM may be at higher risk of RN. Collectively, these data suggest that, in the eight-week window around SRS administration, if HER2-directed therapy is medically necessary, it is preferable that patients receive a single agent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163666PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.854364DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systemic therapy
12
type systemic
12
her2-directed therapy
12
patients
10
srs
9
radiation necrosis
8
her2+ breast
8
breast cancer
8
cancer brain
8
patients treated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!