Objective: Reflex cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening of blood specimens with a CD4 count of <100 cells/µL was performed at 45 South African CD4 laboratories using a lateral flow assay (LFA). Our objective was to evaluate the reliability of routine LFA results through comparative interlaboratory testing.

Methods: All CrAg-positive and a selected number of CrAg-negative samples from the CD4 laboratories were retested at paired microbiology laboratories using the same LFA. Samples with discordant results were tested at a reference laboratory, using the LFA (with CrAg titers).

Results: During interlaboratory testing, 12,502 samples were retested, with 93 (0.7%) discordant results and a between-laboratory agreement of 99.3% (Cohen's kappa, 0.98). The proportion of retested samples with discordant results ranged from 0.17% to 5.31% per laboratory pair (median 0.28%), with 3 reporting >3% of results as discordant.

Conclusion: Routine CrAg screening results were reliable, with <1% of samples having discordant results, mainly due to interpretation and transcription errors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631796PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmac037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reflex cryptococcal
8
cryptococcal antigen
8
retrospective assessment
4
assessment national
4
national reflex
4
antigen screening
4
screening program
4
program south
4
south africa
4
africa interlaboratory
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!