Deep Metagenomic Sequencing for Endophthalmitis Pathogen Detection Using a Nanopore Platform.

Am J Ophthalmol

From the Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom (L.L, P.I.M, G.R.W, S.R); Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom (L.L, G.M, P.I.M, S.R). Electronic address:

Published: October 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • * In a sample of 23 patients, nanopore sequencing successfully identified pathogens in all culture-positive cases and additional potential pathogens in 40% of culture-negative cases, while also detecting bacteriophages.
  • * Whole genome sequencing (WGS) showed higher sensitivity than culture and 16S sequencing, making it a promising alternative for pathogen detection, and nanopore sequencing offers a more cost-effective option for point-of-care diagnostics.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the utility of nanopore sequencing for identifying potential causative pathogens in endophthalmitis, comparing culture results against full-length 16S rRNA nanopore sequencing (16S Nanopore), whole genome nanopore sequencing (Nanopore WGS), and Illumina (Illumina WGS).

Design: Cross-sectional diagnostic comparison.

Methods: Patients with clinically suspected endophthalmitis underwent intraocular vitreous biopsy as per standard care. Clinical samples were cultured by conventional methods, together with full-length 16S rRNA and WGS using nanopore and Illumina sequencing platforms.

Results: Of 23 patients (median age 68.5 years [range 47-88]; 14 males [61%]), 18 cases were culture-positive. Nanopore sequencing identified the same cultured organism in all of the culture-positive cases and identified potential pathogens in two culture-negative cases (40%). Nanopore WGS was able to additionally detect the presence of bacteriophages in three samples. The agreements at genus level between culture and 16S Nanopore, Nanopore WGS, and Illumina WGS were 75%, 100%, and 78%, respectively.

Conclusions: Whole genome sequencing has higher sensitivity and provides a viable alternative to culture and 16S sequencing for detecting potential pathogens in endophthalmitis. Moreover, WGS has the ability to detect other potential pathogens in culture-negative cases. Whilst Nanopore and Illumina WGS provide comparable data, nanopore sequencing provides potential for cost-effective point-of-care diagnostics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850836PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.05.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nanopore sequencing
20
nanopore
13
nanopore wgs
12
potential pathogens
12
sequencing
9
pathogens endophthalmitis
8
full-length 16s
8
16s rrna
8
16s nanopore
8
wgs illumina
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!