Entire Versus Medial Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation for Patients With High-Risk Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China. Electronic address:

Published: September 2022

Purpose: We aimed to examine whether elective inclusion of the posterolateral supraclavicular node (SCL) region to the standard medial SCL target volume improves SCL control and survival outcomes in patients with high-risk node-positive breast cancer undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI).

Methods And Materials: We retrospectively reviewed 544 consecutive women with high-risk breast cancer treated with postoperative chest wall/breast and RNI in our center from January 2015 to December 2016. High-risk features were defined as clinical or pathologic stage N2-3b disease. Patients were classified into the medial SCL irradiation (M-SCLI) group and the entire SCL irradiation (E-SCLI) group, which included both the medial and the posterolateral SCL region. SCL recurrence (SCLR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared. Propensity-score matching (PSM) and multivariate cox regression were used for analysis.

Results: The median follow-up time was 64.2 months. Before PSM, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of SCLR between the 2 groups, with 5-year rates of 2.0% in the M-SCLI group and 0.6% in the E-SCLI group (P = .1). After PSM, there was also no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of SCLR (2.1% vs 0.5%; P = .2). Only 2 patients had recurrence in the posterolateral SCL region, with 1 patient in each group. Similarly, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between the M-SCLI and E-SCLI group both before PSM (5-year rates of 78.5% vs 78.8%, P = .8; 92.2% vs 90.0%, P = .2) and after PSM (76.7% vs 77.2%, P = .8; 91.5% vs 88.4%, P = .1). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that E-SCLI was not independently prognostic for DFS and OS.

Conclusions: E-SCLI does not appear to be associated with improved SCL control and survival outcomes in high-risk node-positive breast cancer. These data do not support the routine use of E-SCLI in N2-3b disease. We initiated a multicenter randomized controlled phase 3 study comparing M-SCLI and E-SCLI to further validate these results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
16
high-risk node-positive
12
node-positive breast
12
scl region
12
e-scli group
12
scl
9
nodal irradiation
8
patients high-risk
8
medial scl
8
scl control
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!