Background: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common complication of diabetes. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunct treatment that expedites the healing of DFU.

Aim: To evaluate the cost-utility of using standard wound care (SWC) plus HBOT as compared to SWC alone for the treatment of DFU from a societal perspective in the Indian context.

Method: A Markov decision analysis model comparing SWC with and without HBOT was developed. Data for the model were derived from relevant literature and secondary data from India. The main outcome measures were minor and major lower extremity amputations (LEA) averted, incremental quality-adjusted-life-years (QALY) gained, incremental costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per amputation averted and ICER per QALY gained. Sensitivity and threshold analyses were also done.

Result: HBOT, when added to SWC, lowered the proportion of minor LEA and major LEA among patients with DFU by 6.1% and 4.2%, respectively. The discounted ICER was INR 193,939 [95% CI: 186,745-203,753] or US$ 2,621 [95% CI: 2,524-2,753] per QALY gained.

Conclusion: SWC plus HBOT is not cost-effective in India. Additional information is required on patient experiences with adjunctive HBOT, if it were to be adopted as the standard of care in India.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2022.2085562DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

swc hbot
12
hyperbaric oxygen
8
oxygen therapy
8
standard wound
8
wound care
8
diabetic foot
8
qaly gained
8
hbot
6
swc
5
therapy adjunct
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a risk for amputations, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is explored as a potential treatment to enhance healing and lower amputation rates, although its effectiveness remains debated.
  • A study was conducted with 60 adult patients with DFUs, randomly assigning them to two groups: one receiving HBOT alongside standard wound care (SWC) and the other receiving SWC alone, evaluating various outcomes over four weeks.
  • Results indicated that patients receiving HBOT showed significantly greater improvements in pain, wound size, and healthy tissue formation, as well as a lower incidence of minor amputations compared to those with SWC alone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common complication of diabetes. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunct treatment that expedites the healing of DFU.

Aim: To evaluate the cost-utility of using standard wound care (SWC) plus HBOT as compared to SWC alone for the treatment of DFU from a societal perspective in the Indian context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Several treatment modalities and protocols for ischaemic foot ulcers are available. However, little consensus exists on optimal treatment. The aim of this study was to compare Standard Wound Care (SWC) alone SWC with adjunct hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of ischaemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!