AI Article Synopsis

  • The study addresses the challenges faced by emergency departments in manually validating and coding injury data by evaluating a machine learning-based decision support tool (DST).
  • Implementation of the DST in the Queensland Injury Surveillance Unit led to a 10% decrease in manual coding time and improved accuracy in injury coding across several key data fields.
  • The findings highlight the potential of the DST for near real-time injury surveillance, which can enhance public health responses, especially during events like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Article Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED)-based injury surveillance systems across many countries face resourcing challenges related to manual validation and coding of data.

Objective: This study describes the evaluation of a machine learning (ML)-based decision support tool (DST) to assist injury surveillance departments in the validation, coding, and use of their data, comparing outcomes in coding time, and accuracy pre- and postimplementations.

Methods: Manually coded injury surveillance data have been used to develop, train, and iteratively refine a ML-based classifier to enable semiautomated coding of injury narrative data. This paper describes a trial implementation of the ML-based DST in the Queensland Injury Surveillance Unit (QISU) workflow using a major pediatric hospital's ED data comparing outcomes in coding time and pre- and postimplementation accuracies.

Results: The study found a 10% reduction in manual coding time after the DST was introduced. The Kappa statistics analysis in both DST-assisted and -unassisted data shows increase in accuracy across three data fields, that is, injury intent (85.4% unassisted vs. 94.5% assisted), external cause (88.8% unassisted vs. 91.8% assisted), and injury factor (89.3% unassisted vs. 92.9% assisted). The classifier was also used to produce a timely report monitoring injury patterns during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Hence, it has the potential for near real-time surveillance of emerging hazards to inform public health responses.

Conclusion: The integration of the DST into the injury surveillance workflow shows benefits as it facilitates timely reporting and acts as a DST in the manual coding process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279014PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1863-7176DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

injury surveillance
24
coding time
12
injury
10
decision support
8
support tool
8
validation coding
8
data comparing
8
comparing outcomes
8
outcomes coding
8
manual coding
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!