Patient engagement in healthcare planning and evaluation has been promoted as a way to improve healthcare's ability to meet patients' needs. However, populations experiencing oppression and discrimination, such as racism, colonialism, sexism, heterosexism, cisnormativity, ableism, classism, and poverty, are often underrepresented in patient engagement spaces. The context and structure of patient engagement processes may systematically exclude certain populations from participating in meaningful ways or from participating at all. By excluding certain populations from active, meaningful patient engagement, we risk planning and evaluating health services on the basis of the values, needs, and preferences of the dominant population. This, in turn, will further entrench health inequities and preclude the ability to surface ideas that challenge dominant conceptualisations of health and healthcare, thereby reinforcing the status quo rather than promoting healthcare transformation. Recognising that experiences of health, healthcare, and patient engagement processes are mediated through gender, race, ability, sexual orientation, and other dimensions of diversity, it is proposed that processes for engaging patients in healthcare planning and evaluation must by intersectional, attend to systemic and power relations, and truly put patients in the driver's seat of engagement processes. Health services planners and evaluators need to create more inclusive, accessible, and appropriate patient engagement experiences in order to focus on transforming healthcare towards a more socially just system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3509 | DOI Listing |
J Neurooncol
January 2025
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Purpose: Craniopharyngiomas are histologically benign tumors, but their proximity to vital neurovascular structures can significantly deteriorate functional prognoses and severely restrict patients' social interaction and activity. We retrospectively identified risk factors related to the functional prognoses in patients with craniopharyngioma treated at our center.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent surgery for craniopharyngioma and follow-up at our institution between 2003 and 2022.
Disabil Rehabil
January 2025
Stroke Theme, Level 1, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Unlabelled: Stroke patients are rarely asked about their responses to specific design attributes. Virtual reality (VR) offers a promising tool to explore how hospital environments are experienced after stroke.
Purpose: To gather perspectives and emotional responses regarding physical design attributes of hospital patient rooms after stroke.
Cancer
February 2025
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Background: Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) is an evidence-based strategy shown to mitigate postoperative morbidity; however, platform engagement is required to benefit from RSM. Patients who report current smoking are at high risk for postoperative complications, but it is unknown whether smoking status influences engagement with RSM, symptom severity, or unanticipated acute care visits.
Methods: This observational case-control study was conducted in patients undergoing ambulatory oncologic surgery at a large cancer center.
Health Expect
February 2025
Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Objective: Public Involvement (PI) in applied health and social care research has grown exponentially in the UK. This review aims to synthesise published UK evidence that evaluates the process and/or outcome(s) of PI in applied health and social care research to identify key contextual factors, effective strategies, outcomes and public partner experiences underpinning meaningful PI in research.
Methods: Following a pre-registered protocol, we systematically searched four databases and two key journals for studies conducted within the UK between January 2006 and July 2024.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
January 2025
Universiteit van Amsterdam, faculteit der Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen, afd. Antropologie, Amsterdam.
The tradition of physicians to shake hands with patients is controversial due to the risk of transmitting germs and because of cultural sensitivity. Nevertheless, handshaking is a common way of greeting in Western culture, although some patients prefer not to shake hands for religious or cultural reasons. It is also known that a handshake can transmit pathogenic microorganisms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!