Objective: This investigation aimed to determine whether and to what extent there are transcriptional differences between periodontitis and peri-implantitis in the same susceptible host.
Background: As an immune-mediated inflammatory disease resulting in aggressive bone resorption around dental implants, peri-implantitis constitutes a major threat to dental implants' long-term success. Compared to periodontitis, its etiological molecular mechanism remains elusive. Currently, there are few investigations on these two diseases at the transcriptional level within the same basal environment.
Methods: Ligature-induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis were generated in the same mice. Gingival tissues of healthy, periodontitis, and peri-implantitis sites from the same oral cavity were collected and used for RNA sequencing. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened between periodontitis/peri-implantitis and healthy sites. Enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed. The comprehensive immune landscape was annotated by seq-ImmuCC. Hub genes from peri-implantitis-specific DEGs were filtered using the STRING database and Cytoscape. Validation of the selected hub genes was performed on the GEO106090 dataset (gingival tissues from six periodontitis patients, six peri-implantitis patients, and six healthy controls).
Results: The results indicated that peri-implantitis and periodontitis exhibited significantly distinct transcriptional signatures, with the complement and coagulation cascade pathways and osteoclast differentiation predominating in peri-implantitis mucosa. Compared with periodontitis, peri-implantitis sites exhibited elevated macrophage proportions and relatively enriched macrophage activation and bone loss. Hub genes were selected, and IL1B, CCL3, and CLEC4E were significantly highly expressed in human peri-implantitis mucosa.
Conclusion: The study suggests that the interplay between macrophages and bone resorption seems to be more robust than in periodontitis. IL1B, CCL3, and CLEC4E may be considered promising therapeutic targets for peri-implantitis. These critical biological processes and identified genes may contribute to the etiology of peri-implantitis, which is unique from periodontitis. This work may make way for deeper exploration and contribute significantly to the treatment and prevention of peri-implantitis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9148613 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S363538 | DOI Listing |
J Periodontol
January 2025
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, School of Dentistry - Division of Periodontology and Implantology, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Background: Crown cementation is a common technique for implant-supported prosthodontics. However, for possible slipping of the cement below the mucosal margin, its thorough removal poses some issues. The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of submucosal cement residues in patients with peri-implant disease by endoscopic visualization and to investigate the potential correlation between the pathological scenario and the spatial position of cement residues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Periodontol
January 2025
Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Background: To investigate the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on the incidence of peri-implantitis (PI) and peri-implant mucositis (PIM).
Methods: Radiographic and clinical chart reviews were conducted to measure the probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing, and marginal bone loss (MBL) around the implants to diagnose peri-implant diseases based on the 2017 workshop classification. Values were recorded at the baseline (T0) to the last available chart and radiograph (T1).
Oral Radiol
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oblique radiographic projection using the intraoral paralleling technique in detecting various peri-implant bone defects.
Methods: Artificial mandibular models with appropriate radiopacity were created. An alveolar bone model without bone defects and models with 12 types of peri-implant bone defects (buccal, circumferential, and mixed types with different widths and depths) were created.
J Oral Implantol
January 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of non-surgical laser therapies compared to other treatment modalities for managing peri-implantitis and to analyze post-treatment outcomes of different interventions.
Data And Sources: A comprehensive search was conducted across Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), identifying 4675 studies published between January 1953 and November 2023.
Study Selection: A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 540 patients and 658 implants met the inclusion criteria, with 10 studies eligible for meta-analyses.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!