The reorganisation of emergency general surgery services during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: outcomes of delayed presentation, socio-economic deprivation and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic patients.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health emergency. Lockdown restrictions and the reconfiguration of healthcare systems to accommodate an increase in critical care capacity have had an impact on 'non-COVID' specialties. This study characterises the utilisation of emergency general surgery (EGS) services during the UK lockdown period at a university teaching hospital with a catchment population that represents one of the most deprived and ethnically diverse areas in the UK.

Methods: EGS admissions during the UK lockdown period (March to May 2020) were compared with the same period in 2019. Patient demographics were recorded together with clinical presentation, hospital stay and treatment outcomes, and readmission data.

Results: The study included 645 patients, comprising 223 in the COVID-19 period and 422 in the non-COVID-19 period. There was no difference in age, sex, comorbidity or socio-economic status. A lower proportion of patients of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnicity (BAME) were admitted during the pandemic (20.6% vs 35.4%,  < 0.05). The duration of symptoms prior to presentation was longer, and admission clinical parameters and serum inflammatory markers. More patients presented with an acute kidney injury (9.9% vs 4.7%,  = 0.012). There was no difference in perioperative outcomes or 30-day mortality, but more patients were readmitted following conservative management (10.6% vs 4.7%,  = 0.023).

Conclusions: The reorganisation of EGS to a senior-led model has been successful in terms of outcomes and access to treatment despite a more unwell population. There was a significantly lower proportion of BAME admissions suggesting additional barriers to healthcare access under pandemic lockdown conditions.