Background: Recently, the efficacy and outcomes of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) have been well established; however, specific data regarding the clinical outcomes of total laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) are still limited. The present study aims to directly compare the clinical and oncological outcomes following TLPD versus OPD at a single institution.

Methods: The clinical data of 127 consecutive patients who underwent TLPD (n = 69) and OPD (n = 58) and were admitted to our department between January 2017 and June 2019 were analysed retrospectively. The short-term and oncological outcomes in the two groups were compared.

Results: Compared to the OPD group, the TLPD group experienced a longer operative time [(399.1 ± 77.9) min vs. (247.9 ± 61.8) min] and significantly earlier oral intake [5.0 (IQR, 4.0-6.0) days vs. 8.0 (IQR, 6.0-8.0) days], earlier postoperative exhaust [3.0 (IQR, 3.0-4.0) days vs. 4.0 (IQR, 4.0-4.5) days], earlier out-of-bed activity [2.0 (IQR, 1.0-2.3) days vs. 3.0 (IQR, 2.0-3.0) days], earlier nasogastric tube removal [5.5 (IQR, 4.0-7.8) days vs. 8.0 (IQR, 6.0-11.0) days] and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay [14.0 (IQR, 11.0-21.0) days vs. 16.0 (IQR, 12.0-25.0) days] (P < 0.05). The estimated blood loss [(334.4 ± 157.8) mL vs. (344.6 ± 259.1) mL], presence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B/C, 5.8% vs. 5.2%) and the overall complication rate (23.2% vs. 25.9%) did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). Regarding the oncological outcomes, there were no significant differences in pathological types, tumour size, lymph nodes harvested, tumour stages or resection margins, or in overall survival (OS) (56.9% vs. 53.2%, P = 0.704) or progression-free survival (PFS) (48.3% vs. 46.8%, P = 0.881) with a median 26-month follow-up.

Conclusion: TLPD is a safe and feasible procedure in select patients after a certain learning curve. Compared with OPD, TLPD has equivalent short-term and oncological outcomes and offers the advantages of faster postoperative recovery and shorter length of hospital stay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02478-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oncological outcomes
20
days iqr
16
total laparoscopic
12
short-term oncological
12
days] earlier
12
iqr
10
laparoscopic versus
8
versus open
8
open pancreaticoduodenectomy
8
outcomes total
8

Similar Publications

Initial experience of a novel surgical assist robot "Saroa" featuring tactile feedback and a roll-clutch system in radical prostatectomy.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwashita 163-1, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8567, Japan.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Saroa Surgical Robot System in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). We enrolled 60 patients who underwent RARP using either the Saroa (n = 9) or da Vinci Xi (n = 51) systems at Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital from January 2022 to March 2024. We compared preoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative urinary continence at three months between the two groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

the evolution of axillary management in breast cancer has witnessed significant changes in recent decades, leading to an overall reduction in surgical interventions. There have been notable shifts in practice, aiming to minimize morbidity while maintaining oncologic outcomes and accurate staging for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. These advancements have been facilitated by the improved efficacy of adjuvant therapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

tumour specific surgery in colon cancer is gaining popularity among colorectal surgeons. Many advocate adapting surgical technique based on preoperative CT staging as not all patients require complete mesocolic excision (CME) and D3 lymphadenectomy. We aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of preoperative CT scans in nodal staging and analyse whether inadequate CT staging could have influenced local recurrences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Transfer of the supinator motor branches to the posterior interosseous nerve (SPIN) was first described as a reliable method of restoration of digit extension in cases of paralysis when there is retained function in the 5th and 6th cervical nerve roots with loss of function in the 8th cervical nerve root.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all the SPIN transfers that were performed in our unit which included 16 limbs in 14 patients over a 6-year period. The median age was 49 years (range 22-74).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Residual, recurrent, and second primary head and neck cancers are on the rise. This is largely driven by a younger age at diagnosis and increasingly targeted chemoradiotherapy options. Salvage surgery remains the only curative intent option in this cohort of patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!