A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

MgO and BeO Nanocages as Sorbents and Sensors for HS and SO Gases: A Theoretical Approach. | LitMetric

MgO and BeO Nanocages as Sorbents and Sensors for HS and SO Gases: A Theoretical Approach.

Nanomaterials (Basel)

Physics Department, College of Science and Arts, Najran University, Najran 11001, Saudi Arabia.

Published: May 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study used Density Functional Theory (DFT) to analyze how HS and SO gases interact with BeO and MgO nano-cages.
  • MgO is found to be a better sorbent for these gases compared to BeO, with SO showing a stronger adsorption capability than HS.
  • The results indicate that both types of nano-cages can act as effective sorbents and sensors for HS and SO gases due to their exothermic reactions.

Article Abstract

Theoretical calculations based on the Density Functional Theory (DFT) have been performed to investigate the interaction of HS as well SO gaseous molecules at the surfaces of BeO and MgO nano-cages. The results show that a MgO nano-cage is a better sorbent than a BeO nano-cage for the considered gases. Moreover, the ability of SO gas to be adsorbed is higher than that of HS gas. The HOMO-LUMO gap (E) of BeO nano-cage is more sensitive to SO than HS adsorption, while the E value of MgO nano-cage reveals higher sensitivity to HS than SO adsorption. The molecular dynamic calculations show that the HS molecule cannot be retained at the surface of a BeO nano-cage within 300-700 K and cannot be retained on a MgO nano-cage at 700 K, while the SO molecule can be retained at the surfaces of BeO and MgO nano-cages up to 700 K. Moreover, the thermodynamic calculations indicate that the reactions between HS as well SO with BeO and MgO nano-cages are exothermic. Our results suggest that we can use BeO and MgO nano-cages as sorbents as well as sensors for HS and SO gases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9143161PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12101757DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

beo mgo
16
mgo nano-cages
16
mgo nano-cage
12
beo nano-cage
12
mgo
8
sensors gases
8
surfaces beo
8
molecule retained
8
beo
7
nano-cage
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!