A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effectiveness of skin allografts in survival rate of patients with major burns. | LitMetric

Background: Burns are still one of the most prevalent injuries in the world. Allograft is in high demand as a biological dressing for any superficial open wounds, not just burn victims. Skin allograft is the gold standard for treating burns in people who do not have enough skin to cover all of the injured areas of their bodies. Studies have shown that skin allografts are superior to topical antimicrobial dressings in partial thickness burns and can reduce complications and length of hospital stay in burn patients. However, to the best of our knowledge very few studies have investigated these results in our country. The aim of the current study is to evaluate and report the outcomes of skin allograft on burn patient survival in Iran.

Method: This prospective clinical trial study was performed on patients admitted to the burn center of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran between July 15, 2017 and April 27, 2021. The control group consisted of patients admitted to the burn ward who were not undergoing skin allografts. This group was matched with the case group in terms of sex, age, and percentage of burns. We compared the outcome of the study was the duration of hospitalization, and status of patients at discharge. The study protocol was approved by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) under the code of IRCT2016112431074N1 (https://fa.irct.ir/trial/24517).

Result: Overall, 112 patients in the case group and 224 patients in the control group were studied. The length of hospital stay in the case group (41.13±11.7) was considerably longer than the control group (24.6±12.1) (P<0.001), but the mortality rate in the two groups was not statistically different (P=0.633). The average survival time of case group (53 days, 95% CI=45-56) was higher than the control group (49 days, 95% CI=39-58) (P=0.012). Number of allograft usage (OR=0.038, 95% CI=0.142-0.945) and also Age (OR=1.03, 95% CI=1.005-1.070) were predictors of death.

Conclusion: Although the use of skin allografts in large burns (more than 50%) reduced mortality in burn patients, their use in burns less than 50% has not been effective in reducing patient mortality. Due to the limited access to this valuable product, its use in burns less than 50% should be done with caution and, due to the limited access to skin allografts in most burn centers in Iran, patients with extensive burns (more than 50%) should be used as a priority.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9123452PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin allografts
12
control group
12
case group
12
skin allograft
8
length hospital
8
hospital stay
8
patients admitted
8
admitted burn
8
patients
7
group
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!