Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner mismatch in follow-up bone mineral density testing.

Osteoporos Int

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 13-103 Clinical Sciences Building, 11350-83 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.

Published: September 2022

Unlabelled: Scanner mismatch occurs frequently with follow-up dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Nearly one-in-five follow-up DXA scans were conducted on non-cross-calibrated scanners (scanner mismatch) and more than a quarter of patients who had a follow-up DXA scan had experienced scanner mismatch.

Introduction: Detecting significant changes in bone mineral density (BMD) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners relies on the least significant change (LSC). Results from two different DXA scanners can only be compared, albeit with decreased sensitivity for change, if the LSC between the two scanners has been directly determined through cross-calibration. Performing follow-up DXA scans on non-cross-calibrated scanners (scanner mismatch) has safety and economic implications. This study aims to determine the proportion of scanner mismatch occurring at a population level.

Methods: All patients who completed at least two DXA scans between 1 April 2009 and 31 December 2018 in the province of Alberta, Canada, were identified using population-based health services databases. Scanner mismatch was defined as a follow-up DXA scan completed on a DXA scanner that differed from and was not cross-calibrated to the previous DXA scanner. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess predictive factors that may contribute to scanner mismatch.

Results: A total of 264,866 patients with 470,641 follow-up DXA scans were identified. Scanner mismatch occurred in 18.9% of follow-up DXA scans; 28.7% of patients experienced at least one scanner mismatch. Longer duration between scans (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.24-1.26) and major osteoporotic fracture history before index scan (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08) increased risk of scanner mismatch. Osteoporosis medication use before index scan (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.88-0.91), recency of follow-up scans (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-0.98), female sex (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.00), and age at last scan (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) were associated with lower risk of scanner mismatch.

Conclusion: Scanner mismatch is a common problem, occurring in one-in-five follow-up DXA scans and affecting more than a quarter of patients. Interventions to reduce this large proportion of scanner mismatch are necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06438-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scanner mismatch
44
dxa scans
28
follow-up dxa
28
scanner
16
dxa
13
dual-energy x-ray
12
x-ray absorptiometry
12
mismatch
11
follow-up
10
scans
9

Similar Publications

Comparative evaluation of intraoral scanners and a spectrophotometer for percent correct shade identification in clinical dentistry.

Clin Oral Investig

January 2025

Center for Dental Medicine, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.

Objectives: The study aimed to assess the percent correct shade identification of four intraoral scanners (IOS) and a spectrophotometer, focusing on how reliably each device selects the correct tooth shade compared to a visual observer's selection. The research question addresses how much clinicians can trust the device-selected shade without visual verification.

Materials And Methods: Sixteen participants with natural, unrestored teeth were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: While many clinical computed tomography (CT) protocols use helical scanning, the traditional method for measuring the volume CT Dose Index (CTDI) requires modifying the helical protocol to perform a single axial rotation. This modification can present challenges and mismatched settings across various scanner models.

Purpose: This study investigates the generalizability of a helical methodology for estimating CTDI across a diverse range of participants, CT scanner models, and protocol parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aims to quantify the repeatability of a 3D Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) research protocol in the context of a scanner software upgrade. All of MRI assumes consistent hardware performance and raw data pre-processing on the acquisition side. Software upgrades can affect hardware specifications and reconstruction chain parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Feasibility of shortening scan duration of F-FDG myocardial metabolism imaging using a total-body PET/CT scanner.

EJNMMI Phys

October 2024

PET Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of F-FDG myocardial metabolism imaging (MMI) using a total-body PET/CT scanner and determine optimal scan durations for clinical use.
  • Involving 41 patients, the research compared images obtained from varying scan times (600s to 30s) using subjective and semi-quantitative evaluations to measure image quality and myocardial viability.
  • Results showed that while shorter scan times decreased overall image quality and specific metrics, images taken at 120 seconds were found adequate for clinical diagnosis, and those at 30 seconds were acceptable for assessing myocardial viability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the 2024 David G. Sherman Lecture, Steven J. Warach, illustrating with examples from his research, walks through the history of magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke from the 1990s and early 2000s with the introduction, validation, and application of diffusion-weighted imaging, penumbral imaging (the diffusion-perfusion mismatch), and other imaging markers of the acute stroke pathology into routine clinical practice and stroke trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!