A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Comparative Study Between Porcine Peritoneum and Pericardium as Cardiovascular Material. | LitMetric

A Comparative Study Between Porcine Peritoneum and Pericardium as Cardiovascular Material.

Tissue Eng Part C Methods

College of Polymer Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Published: June 2022

Decellularized porcine pericardium has many applications in the cardiovascular field for its excellent properties. The peritoneum is a single-layer bio-dialysis membrane with many similarities and differences in physical characteristics, biochemical composition, and structure to the pericardium. The limited available literature suggests that, similar to the pericardium, the peritoneum has good application potential in the field of cardiovascular substitute materials. This research focused on comparing the differences between decellularized peritoneum and decellularized pericardium in microstructure, biochemical composition, mechanical properties, hemocompatibility, enzymatic degradation, calcification, cytocompatibility, and other vital indicators. The peritoneum was consistent with pericardium in terms of fibrous structure, hemocompatibility, calcification, and cytocompatibility. The peritoneal elastic fiber content (219 μg/mg) was significantly higher than that of the pericardium (66 μg/mg), resulting in two to three times higher maximum load (21.1 N) and burst pressure (1309 mmHg), and better performance than the pericardium in terms of resistance to enzymatic degradation. In the cardiovascular field, decellularized peritoneum can be used as vascular substitute material. Impact statement There are many similarities between the embryonic origin and morphological structure of the porcine peritoneum and the porcine pericardium, but little research has been done on the use of the porcine peritoneum as a biomaterial. In this compared research, we showed that porcine peritoneum had better resistance to enzymatic degradation, better stretching, and more suitable burst pressure for being used as vascular substitute material. This research is the first to describe the structural composition of porcine peritoneum and its advantageous properties as a cardiovascular material.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2022.0028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

porcine peritoneum
20
enzymatic degradation
12
peritoneum
10
pericardium
9
cardiovascular material
8
porcine pericardium
8
cardiovascular field
8
biochemical composition
8
decellularized peritoneum
8
calcification cytocompatibility
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!