Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor (MSD-HSCT) and intensive immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are 2 major comparable treatments for SAA. As the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG) to standard IST therapy has greatly improved the survival prognosis of SAA, whether MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG is the better choice has become a matter of debate. A study was performed involving 99 patients with newly diagnosed acquired SAA from 5 medical centers, including 48 MSD-HSCT cases and 51 IST/EPAG cases, which consisted of rabbit antithymocyte globulin or porcine-antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine plus eltrombopag. The results suggested that patients treated with MSD-HSCT or IST/EPAG had similar overall survival (OS) rates exceeding 95% (P = .97). However, the event-free survival rate (EFS) of IST/EPAG (71.0%) was significantly lower than that of MSD-HSCT (89.6%), P = .04. Subgroup analysis indicated that the OS of the MSD-HSCT group was superior to that of the IST/EPAG group (100% versus 85.7%, P = .04) among those with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA). Both the complete response rate (CR) and overall response rate (OR) with MSD-HSCT were significantly higher than those with IST/EPAG (CR: 79.2% versus 15.7%, P < .001; OR: 97.9% versus 72.6%, P = .001). In conclusion, IST/EPAG or MSD-HSCT treatment achieves an equally high OS in SAA, but MSD-HSCT leads to a better OS in patients with VSAA and shows advantages in improving EFS and accelerating hematopoietic reconstruction in patients with SAA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.027 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!