Maternal pregnancy outcomes in women with cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Am J Obstet Gynecol

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Rosie Hospital and National Institute for Health and Care Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: October 2022

Objective: This study aimed to systematically assess the impact of cardiomyopathy on maternal pregnancy outcomes.

Data Sources: PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to April 24, 2022.

Study Eligibility Criteria: Observational cohort, case-control, and case-cohort studies in human populations were included if they reported predefined maternal outcomes for pregnant women with cardiomyopathy (any subtype) and for an appropriate control population (pregnant women with no known heart disease or pregnant women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease).

Methods: Two reviewers independently assessed the articles for eligibility and risk of bias, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Data were extracted and synthesized according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

Results: A total of 14 studies (n=57,539,306 pregnancies) were eligible for inclusion. Women with cardiomyopathy were more likely to deliver by cesarean delivery than women with no heart disease (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 2.47-3.55; I=95%; P≤.00001) or women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease (odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-2.22; I=91%; P<.00001). Having cardiomyopathy conferred a greater risk for experiencing severe maternal adverse cardiovascular events during pregnancy when compared with not having any heart disease (odds ratio, 206.64; 95% confidence interval, 192.09-222.28; I=73%; P<.0001) or having noncardiomyopathy heart disease (odds ratio, 7.09; 95% confidence interval; 6.08-8.27; I=88%; P<.00001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among women with cardiomyopathy than among women with no heart disease (odds ratio, 126.67; 95% confidence interval, 43.01-373.07; I=87%; P<.00001) or among women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease (odds ratio, 4.30; 95% confidence interval, 3.42-5.40; I=0%; P<.00001).

Conclusion: Pregnant women with cardiomyopathy have increased risks for adverse maternal outcomes, including maternal death, when compared with both women with no heart disease and women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease. Our results highlight the importance of preconception risk assessments to allow for informed decision-making before pregnancy. Pregnancies affected by cardiomyopathy are high risk and should be managed by expert, multidisciplinary obstetrical and cardiology teams.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

women cardiomyopathy
12
pregnant women
12
heart disease
12
maternal pregnancy
8
women heart
8
women noncardiomyopathy
8
noncardiomyopathy heart
8
disease odds
8
odds ratio
8
95% confidence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!