A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The impact of microscopic versus macroscopic extranodal extension in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: National cancer database analysis and review of the literature. | LitMetric

Objective: To analyze the prognostic significance of microscopic vs macroscopic extranodal extension and to assess the impact of chemoradiation on overall survival among patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and varying degrees of extranodal extension.

Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 7975 patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and varying degrees of extranodal extension who underwent primary surgical intervention. Propensity-score matched models following Cox regression analyses allowed us to assess the impact of adjuvant radiation alone vs adjuvant chemoradiation on overall survival in patients with microscopic extranodal extension and macroscopic extranodal extension.

Results: 7975 patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma were included in the final analysis. Within this cohort, 25.4% had microscopic extranodal extension and 5.2% had macroscopic extranodal extension. On univariate analysis, we found that microscopic and macroscopic extranodal extension were associated with decreased overall survival when compared to those with positive nodes without extranodal extension (HR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.56, 1.79 and HR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.66, 2.14, respectively). On multivariate analysis after propensity-score matching, we found no significant difference in overall survival in patients who received adjuvant radiation alone vs. adjuvant chemoradiation for both microscopic and macroscopic extranodal extension.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that microscopic extranodal extension in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is associated with worse overall survival than patients without extranodal extension following primary surgical intervention with neck dissection. The results of this study also suggest that the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiation may not provide a significant survival benefit in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with microscopic and macroscopic extranodal extension. Comprehensive assessment of the benefits of adjuvant chemoradiation in the setting of microscopic vs macroscopic extranodal extension would need to be studied in a randomized controlled trial.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103511DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extranodal extension
48
macroscopic extranodal
32
oral cavity
24
cavity squamous
24
squamous cell
24
cell carcinoma
24
microscopic macroscopic
20
survival patients
16
patients oral
16
extranodal
15

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!