A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cervical Lesion Classification Method Based on Cross-Validation Decision Fusion Method of Vision Transformer and DenseNet. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper introduces a fusion method combining Vision Transformer and DenseNet161 models to enhance clinical diagnosis accuracy.
  • The methodology involves processing acetic acid images, training the models using fivefold cross-validation, and averaging the predictions to determine the most likely classification.
  • The proposed method achieved a 68% accuracy rate for identifying cervical lesions, reducing missed detections and improving patient health outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: In order to better adapt to clinical applications, this paper proposes a cross-validation decision-making fusion method of Vision Transformer and DenseNet161.

Methods: The dataset is the most critical acetic acid image for clinical diagnosis, and the SR areas are processed by a specific method. Then, the Vision Transformer and DenseNet161 models are trained by the fivefold cross-validation method, and the fivefold prediction results corresponding to the two models are fused by different weights. Finally, the five fused results are averaged to obtain the category with the highest probability.

Results: The results show that the fusion method in this paper reaches an accuracy rate of 68% for the four classifications of cervical lesions.

Conclusions: It is more suitable for clinical environments, effectively reducing the missed detection rate and ensuring the life and health of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9124126PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3241422DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fusion method
12
method vision
12
vision transformer
12
method
6
cervical lesion
4
lesion classification
4
classification method
4
method based
4
based cross-validation
4
cross-validation decision
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!