AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients with primary brain tumors often experience mobility issues, and this study assesses the effectiveness of two mobility tests, Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five-Times Sit-to-Stand (TSS), in evaluating these challenges in a neuro-oncology clinic setting.
  • During a 6-month period, 66 adult patients completed these tests alongside the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, revealing that 94% successfully completed the mobility assessments, highlighting the tests' feasibility.
  • Results indicated that factors like older age, being newly diagnosed, corticosteroid use, and poorer performance status significantly correlated with longer test completion times, suggesting these tests could be useful in clinical settings for better understanding patient mobility.

Article Abstract

Background: Patients with primary brain tumors (PBT) face significant mobility issues related to their disease and/or treatment. Here, the authors describe the preliminary utility and feasibility of two established mobility measures, the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five-Times Sit-to-Stand (TSS) tests, in quickly and objectively assessing the mobility status of PBT patients at a single institution's neuro-oncology clinic.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing routine PBT care completed the TUG/TSS tests and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor module (MDASI-BT), which assessed symptom burden and interference with daily life, during clinic visits over a 6-month period. Research staff assessed feasibility metrics, including test completion times/rates, and collected demographic, clinical, and treatment data. Mann-Whitney tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman's rho correlations were used to interrogate relationships between TUG/TSS test completion times and patient characteristics.

Results: The study cohort included 66 PBT patients, 59% male, with a median age of 47 years (range: 20-77). TUG/TSS tests were completed by 62 (94%) patients. Older patients ( < .001) and those who were newly diagnosed ( = .024), on corticosteroids ( = .025), or had poor (≤80) KPS ( < .01) took longer to complete the TUG/TSS tests. Worse activity-related (work, activity, and walking) interference was associated with longer TUG/TSS test completion times ( < .001).

Conclusions: The TUG/TSS tests are feasible for use among PBT patients and may aid in clinical care. Older age, being newly diagnosed, using corticosteroids, poor (≤80) KPS, and high activity-related interference were associated with significant mobility impairment, highlighting the tests' potential clinical utility. Future investigations are warranted to longitudinally explore feasibility and utility in other practice and disease settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113321PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tug/tss tests
16
pbt patients
12
test completion
12
assessing mobility
8
primary brain
8
patients
8
established mobility
8
tests
8
tug/tss test
8
completion times
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Patients with primary brain tumors often experience mobility issues, and this study assesses the effectiveness of two mobility tests, Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five-Times Sit-to-Stand (TSS), in evaluating these challenges in a neuro-oncology clinic setting.
  • During a 6-month period, 66 adult patients completed these tests alongside the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, revealing that 94% successfully completed the mobility assessments, highlighting the tests' feasibility.
  • Results indicated that factors like older age, being newly diagnosed, corticosteroid use, and poorer performance status significantly correlated with longer test completion times, suggesting these tests could be useful in clinical settings for better understanding patient mobility.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!