Purpose: Retinoscopy is a skill that requires the integration of procedural skill and declarative knowledge. Whilst the actual technique is simple, retinoscopy is a complex skill to acquire and is one that students often find challenging. This study compared the strategies that novices, third-year students and experts use when performing retinoscopy, with the aim of identifying the key stages of learning that may enlighten teaching practice.
Method: This study employed a protocol-based approach in which the verbal protocols and cognitive strategies of novices, students and experts were recorded and then subjected to 'problem space' analysis.
Results: Clear differences existed when the retinoscopy of novices, students and experts was directly compared using a standardised simulated task. Experts were more accurate in performance and used defined strategies to reach the goal. The presence of these strategies significantly predicted the accuracy of the retinoscopy result.
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of meta-cognitive strategies and the need for an adequate theoretical foundation in skill acquisition. The underpinning knowledge provides a pedagogic tool that specifies activities which are beneficial to learning a clinical skill.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13007 | DOI Listing |
Comput Inform Nurs
January 2025
Author Affiliations: Wolters Kluwer (Drs Moran and Terry, Ms Chery, Mrs Madden, and Rightler); and Independent Psychometric Consultant (Dr Viger).
End-of-program predictive examinations have been in existence in nursing education for over 10 years. Nursing schools have used these examinations to prepare students on the testable content from National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), which has been delivering the NCLEX-RN since 1994. Nursing students, in the final semester of the nursing program, took the Predictable Ability Measurement Readiness (PAMR) 1 and/or 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFScientificWorldJournal
December 2024
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Oral cancer is responsible for increased mortality, especially in the Indian subcontinent. Habits like smoking and tobacco chewing are among the most common causes of oral cancer. Previously, these habits were seen mainly in the elderly; however, the trends have seemed to increase in the younger generation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Allergy Clin Immunol Glob
February 2025
Big Data Department, Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific writing is rapidly increasing, raising concerns about authorship identification, content quality, and writing efficiency.
Objectives: This study investigates the real-world impact of ChatGPT, a large language model, on those aspects in a simulated publication scenario.
Methods: Forty-eight individuals representing 3 medical expertise levels (medical students, residents, and experts in allergy or dermatology) evaluated 3 blinded versions of an atopic dermatitis case report: one each human written (HUM), AI generated (AI), and combined written (COM).
Med Sci Educ
December 2024
Division of General Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH USA.
Introduction: Social media has numerous academic and professional benefits and is increasingly valued within healthcare. MedTwitter is an online community of medical professionals on the X platform (formerly Twitter). Despite MedTwitter's numerous benefits and far-reaching users, few medical schools teach students about this resource.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Sci Educ
December 2024
Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park Campus, Swansea, Wales, SA2 8PP UK.
Unlabelled: Problem-solving and higher-order learning are goals of higher education. It has been repeatedly suggested that multiple-choice questions (MCQs) can be used to test higher-order learning, although objective empirical evidence is lacking and MCQs are often criticised for assessing only lower-order, factual, or 'rote' learning. These challenges are compounded by a lack of agreement on what constitutes higher order learning: it is normally defined subjectively using heavily criticised frameworks such as such as Bloom's taxonomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!