A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The predictive value of internal carotid artery wall thickness in computed tomography angiography to avoid complications of plaque removal failure in modified eversion carotid endarterectomy. | LitMetric

Aim: The benefits of computed tomography carotid angiography (CTA) in terms of evaluating the anatomical structure of the carotid arteries, surgical planning, and evaluating possible risks were reported in previous studies. This study aimed to calculate the predictive value of internal carotid wall thickness in CTA that can predict whether a modified carotid eversion endarterectomy (MCEE) will result in a successful or not.

Method: This study was designed in a retrospective cross-sectional format. Consecutive 83 symptomatic carotid surgery patients who were operated in our hospital and had CTA were included in this study. The wall thickness of the internal carotid artery (ICA) 20 mm distal from the carotid bifurcation was calculated in axial sections using a three-dimensional imaging technique. In addition, all patients' characteristics and laboratory findings were recorded. Patients who failed MCEE and required classical carotid endarterectomy were compared with patients who had successful MCEE.

Results: MCEE technique was applied to 62 patients. In 21 patients, the MCEE technique failed and the classical endarterectomy technique was required. Preoperative clinical and laboratory characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean ICA wall thickness was 0.65 mm 20 mm distal to from the carotid bifurcation and it was lower in the group with successful MCEE (1.03 ± 0.21 mm vs. 0.56 ± 0.08 mm) ( < 0.001). The critical ICA wall thickness was calculated as 0.76 mm in the group that MCEE failed and classical carotid endarterectomy was required. Cut-off analysis of ICA wall thickness was calculated as 0.755 mm in ROC analysis ( < 0.001), (95% confidence interval, curve area; 0.985).

Conclusion: Successful carotid endarterectomy with the MCEE method is associated with distal ICA wall thickness and distal extension of the atheroma plate. The use of ICA wall thickness 20 mm distal to from the bifurcation as a predictive value for the success of the MCEE technique is beneficial to avoid serious complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17085381221102790DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wall thickness
32
ica wall
20
carotid endarterectomy
16
carotid
13
internal carotid
12
20 mm distal
12
mcee technique
12
predictive internal
8
carotid artery
8
wall
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!