Influence of Woven-Fabric Type on the Efficiency of Fabric-Reinforced Polymer Composites.

The greatest advantage of fiber-reinforced composite materials is the freedom to tailor their strength and stiffness properties, while the most significant disadvantage consists in their high costs. Therefore, the design process and especially the optimization phase becomes an important step. The geometry of the fabric of each lamina as well as their stacking sequence need to be carefully defined, starting from some basic geometric variables. The input parameters are the widths and the heights of the tows, the laminate-stacking sequence and the gaps between two successive tows or the height of the neat matrix. This paper is a follow-up to a previous work on using and improving an in-house software called (Satin Optimization with a Modified Genetic Algorithm), aimed to optimize the geometrical parameters of satin-reinforced multi-layer composites. The final goal is to find out the way in which various types of woven fabrics can affect the best possible solution to the problem of designing a composite material, able to withstand a given set of in-plane loads. The efficiency of the composite structure is evaluated by its ultimate strains using a fitness function that analyses and compares the mechanical behavior of different fabric-reinforced composites. Therefore, the ultimate strains corresponding to each configuration are considered intermediate data, being analyzed comparatively until obtaining the optimal values. When the software is running, for each analysis step, a set of intermediate values is provided. However, the users do not have to store these values, because the final result of the optimization directly provides the composite configuration with maximum efficiency, whose structural response meets the initially imposed loading conditions. To illustrate how the software works, six different satin-woven-fabric-reinforced composites, starting from plain weave (satin 2/1/1), then satin 3/1/1, satin 4/1/1, satin 5/1/1, satin 5/2/1 and finally satin 5/3/1, were evaluated in the interface. The results were rated against each other in terms of the composite efficiency and the case characterized by minimal reinforcement undulation (thinnest laminate) were highlighted.