Inertial capture (InCap) systems combined with musculoskeletal (MSK) models are an attractive option for monitoring 3D joint kinematics in an ecological context. However, the primary limiting factor is the sensor-to-segment calibration, which is crucial to estimate the body segment orientations. Walking, running, and stair ascent and descent trials were measured in eleven healthy subjects with the Xsens InCap system and the Vicon 3D motion capture (MoCap) system at a self-selected speed. A novel integrated method that combines previous sensor-to-segment calibration approaches was developed for use in a MSK model with three degree of freedom (DOF) hip and knee joints. The following were compared: RMSE, range of motion (ROM), peaks, and R between InCap kinematics estimated with different calibration methods and gold standard MoCap kinematics. The integrated method reduced the RSME for both the hip and the knee joints below 5°, and no statistically significant differences were found between MoCap and InCap kinematics. This was consistent across all the different analyzed movements. The developed method was integrated on an MSK model workflow, and it increased the sensor-to-segment calibration accuracy for an accurate estimate of 3D joint kinematics compared to MoCap, guaranteeing a clinical easy-to-use approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104520PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093259DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sensor-to-segment calibration
16
joint kinematics
8
integrated method
8
msk model
8
hip knee
8
knee joints
8
incap kinematics
8
calibration
5
kinematics
5
inertial sensor-to-segment
4

Similar Publications

Calibrating inertial measurement units (IMUs) involves converting orientation data from a local reference frame into a clinically meaningful reference system. Several solutions exist but little work has been done to compare different calibration methods with each other and an optical motion capture system. Thirteen healthy subjects with no signs of upper limb injury were recruited for this study and instrumented with IMU sensors and optical markers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of IMU sensor-to-segment calibration on clinical 3D elbow joint angles estimation.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol

May 2024

Energy Efficient Embedded Digital Architectures, Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Trento, Italy.

Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) require a sensor-to-segment calibration procedure in order to compute anatomically accurate joint angles and, thereby, be employed in healthcare and rehabilitation. Research literature proposes several algorithms to address this issue. However, determining an optimal calibration procedure is challenging due to the large number of variables that affect elbow joint angle accuracy, including 3D joint axis, movement performed, complex anatomy, and notable skin artefacts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does IMU redundancy improve multi-body optimization results to obtain lower-body kinematics? A preliminary study says no.

J Biomech

May 2024

Equipe RoBioSS, Institut PPRIME, UPR3346 CNRS Université de Poitiers ISAE ENSMA, 11 boulevard Marie et Pierre Curie, Site du Futuroscope TSA 41123, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France.

Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been proposed as an ecological alternative to optoelectronic systems for obtaining human body joint kinematics. Tremendous work has been done to reduce differences between kinematics obtained with IMUs and optoelectronic systems, by improving sensor-to-segment calibration, fusion algorithms, and by using Multibody Kinematics Optimization (MKO). However, these improvements seem to reach a barrier, particularly on transverse and frontal planes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running.

Sensors (Basel)

January 2024

Mechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, Berks College, Reading, PA 19610, USA.

The knee flexion angle is an important measurement for studies of the human gait. Running is a common activity with a high risk of knee injury. Studying the running gait in realistic situations is challenging because accurate joint angle measurements typically come from optical motion-capture systems constrained to laboratory settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!