A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clean Shot: Bacterial Contamination After Positive Pressure Irrigation of Low-Velocity Gunshot Wounds. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the effectiveness of positive pressure irrigation on bacterial contamination in low-velocity gunshot wounds (LV-GSWs) using lamb shank specimens inoculated with bacteria.
  • Results showed no significant differences in bacterial growth before and after the irrigation, with most plates still showing bacterial presence post-irrigation.
  • The findings suggest that using positive pressure irrigation may not be helpful in reducing bacterial contamination during the initial treatment of LV-GSWs in emergency settings.

Article Abstract

Objective: Low-velocity gunshot wounds (LV-GSWs) are a common reason for emergency department visits. Optimal nonsurgical treatment has not been thoroughly studied and is not standardized. The goal of this study was to determine whether positive pressure irrigation reduces the bacterial contamination after a simulated GSW to soft tissue.

Methods: Nineteen lamb shank specimens were prepared with denim inoculated with Serratia marcescens cultures. A 9-mm pistol round was fired from a distance of 3 m through the contaminated denim into the lamb shank. A culture swab was placed in the wound directly after firing, after 250 cubic-centimeters (cc) irrigation with normal saline, and after an additional 250 cc irrigation (for a total of 500 cc). Swabs were then cultured to determine the amount of bacterial growth.

Results: Before irrigation, 0 (0%) plates showed no growth, 2 (10.5%) showed rare growth, 8 (42.1%) showed few growth, 6 (31.6%) showed moderate growth, and 3 (15.8%) showed many growth. After 500 cc irrigation, 2 (10.5%) showed no growth, 1 (5.3%) showed rare growth, 11 (57.9%) showed few growth, 2 (10.5%) showed moderate growth, and 3 (15.8%) showed many growth. Fisher exact test confirmed no significant change in bacterial concentration after irrigation ( P = 0.59). A Pearson test found no correlation between irrigation and bacterial growth (r = -0.15, P = -0.25).

Conclusions: Positive pressure irrigation with up to 500 cc normal saline did not significantly alter the quantity of bacterial growth within a simulated GSW cavity. The data suggest that bedside positive pressure irrigation may not be beneficial in the initial emergency department treatment of LV-GSWs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002409DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive pressure
16
pressure irrigation
16
growth
12
irrigation
10
bacterial contamination
8
low-velocity gunshot
8
gunshot wounds
8
emergency department
8
simulated gsw
8
lamb shank
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!