External and Internal Work Load During a Mountain Time Trial in Trained Handcyclists Versus a World-Class Handcyclist and Determinants of Performance.

Am J Phys Med Rehabil

From the Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (SdG, IK); Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (SdG); Research and Development, Heliomare Rehabilitation Center, Wijk aan Zee, the Netherlands (IK, LJMV); University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, the Netherlands (IK, LHVvdW); Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom (SPH); Sports Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (GV); and University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation, Groningen, the Netherlands (LHVvdW).

Published: June 2023

Objectives: The aims of the study were to evaluate the external and internal work load of trained handcyclists during a mountain time trial, to compare the results with a world-class handcyclist, and to identify time trial performance determinants.

Design: Ten trained and one world-class handcyclists performed a graded exercise test to determine power output and heart rate at the (first and second) ventilatory thresholds and exhaustion. Power output and heart rate were continuously measured during the race.

Results: The mean absolute power output during the race (119 ± 21 vs. 203 W, P < 0.001) was lower in the trained handcyclists compared with the world-class handcyclist. The absolute and relative heart rate during the race (86 ± 7% vs. 88%, P = 0.40) and relative power output during the race (66 ± 10% vs. 62%, P = 0.24) were similar. Trained handcyclists cycled significantly less time at a power output between first and second ventilatory thresholds (48% vs. 64%, P = 0.02) and more at a power output greater than second ventilatory threshold (34% vs. 11%, P = 0.005). Power output at the second ventilatory threshold showed the strongest correlation with finish time ( r = -0.78) and peak power output with mean power output of the race ( r = 0.90).

Conclusions: The laboratory outcome peak power output and power output at the second ventilatory threshold are important performance determinants for longer time trials in handcyclists, and it is, therefore, important to improve these outcomes with training. Because the trained handcyclists cycled most of the race in intensity zones 2 and 3, it is recommended to incorporate these zones also in the training.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10184806PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002050DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

power output
44
trained handcyclists
20
second ventilatory
20
time trial
12
world-class handcyclist
12
heart rate
12
output race
12
output second
12
ventilatory threshold
12
power
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!