Objectives: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of corneal measurements performed by the Galilei G6 and determine its agreement with the Pentacam® AXL.

Methods: 105 eyes underwent examination by both devices, measuring nine parameters. Paired t-tests, Deming Regression, and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine agreement. Analysis of Variance was used to determine repeatability and reproducibility.

Results: Measurements showed no clinically significant differences between the two devices. On average, the Galilei G6 measured axial length longer than the Pentacam® AXL by 0.05 mm ± 0.03 mm (p < 0.001), just 0.2% of the mean value and therefore clinically insignificant. It measured central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth 3.77 μm ± 7.71 μm longer (p < 0.001) and 0.04 mm ± 0.07 μm shorter (p < 0.001), respectively. They are also clinically insignificant, constituting just 0.7% and 1% of the mean values. The results showed evidence of repeatability and reproducibility. Only measurements of corneal cylinder showed some clinically significant variance.

Conclusions: The Galilei G6 and Pentacam® AXL measurements show evidence of repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement for examined parameters. Certain caution needs to be applied in cases with moderate or severe corneal cylinder, due to discrepancies in repeatability and reproducibility of corneal cylinder measurements with the Galilei G6.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2022.2075725DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

repeatability reproducibility
8
agreement pentacam®
8
pentacam® axl
8
determine agreement
8
reproducibility galilei
4
galilei agreement
4
axl optical
4
optical biometry
4
biometry corneal
4
corneal tomography
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: The aim is to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a novel quantitative ultrasound (US) method based on global speed-of-sound (g-SoS) measurement using conventional US machines, for breast density assessment in comparison to mammographic ACR (m-ACR) categories.

Materials And Methods: In a prospective study, g-SoS was assessed in the upper-outer breast quadrant of 100 women, with 92 of them also having m-ACR assessed by two radiologists across the entire breast. For g-SoS, ultrasonic waves were transmitted from varying transducer locations and the image misalignments between these were then related analytically to breast SoS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In health care, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are largely attributed to patient-handling tasks. Reliable assessments of patient mobility are imperative to mitigate the musculoskeletal burden on healthcare providers. This study explores the reliability of MK5 Mobility Classes, a patient mobility classification system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

But so far, few investigators seem interested in having their work repeated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Measurement of repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) is necessary to realize the full potential of positron emission tomography (PET). Several studies have evaluated the reproducibility of PET using 18F-FDG, the most common PET tracer used in oncology, but similar studies using other PET tracers are scarce. Even fewer assess agreement and R&R with statistical methods designed explicitly for the task.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!