AI Article Synopsis

  • Skin sensitization is a major concern for workplace health and safety, and establishing Health-Based Exposure Limits (HBELs) is essential for effective risk assessment based on how skin sensitizing a chemical is.
  • The study calculated Acceptable Surface Limits (ASLs) for 33 different skin sensitizers using specific safety assessment factors and established a composite safety factor of 180, leading to ASL values ranging from 0.001 to 10.417 mg/100 cm².
  • The results indicated that for GHS Category 1A chemicals, surface residue levels should be below 1 mg/100 cm² to reduce sensitization risk, highlighting the need for a quantitative risk assessment and proper management strategies for chemicals in the workplace

Article Abstract

Skin sensitization is an extremely important risk factor for occupational health and safety, and it would be desirable to set health-based exposure limits (HBELs) for the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) based on the skin sensitizing potencies of chemical. We attempted to set acceptable surface limits (ASLs) as HBELs for skin sensitizers in the workplace based on the local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values. To calculate the ASLs, a safety assessment factor (SAF) value of 6, based on the EC1.6 values/human repeat insult patch test (HRIPT) NOEL ratios, a SAF value of 10, and a SAF value of 3 were applied, referring to previous literatures on SAFs for skin sensitization QRA, and the composite SAF was calculated as 180. The ASLs (mg/100 cm ) derived thus for 33 chemicals ranged from 0.001 to 10.417. Comparison of the ranges with known human sensitization potency classes and GHS subcategories revealed that use of GHS Category 1A chemicals needs to be controlled to ensure surface residue levels of less than 1 mg/100 cm . To minimize sensitization risks, a quantitative sensitization risk assessment method for chemicals and appropriate risk management are necessary. This report provides a potentially useful ASL-based method of managing sensitization risk derived from LLNA: BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values, comparison of the ASLs and known human sensitization potency data showed that GHS subcategorization results would be a primary information notifying ASL ranges to be required for minimizing the sensitization risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.4339DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

llna brdu-elisa
12
brdu-elisa ec16
12
ec16 values
12
sensitization potency
12
sensitization risk
12
sensitization
9
acceptable surface
8
surface limits
8
limits asls
8
skin sensitizers
8

Similar Publications

Allergic contact dermatitis is a common occupational and environmental health problem and setting of health-based exposure limits (HBELs) to prevent induction of skin sensitization is strongly desired. When manufacturing pharmaceuticals in a shared facility, cleaning validation using surface residue levels (SRLs) derived from permitted daily exposures (PDEs) is conducted to avoid cross-contamination from the perspective of protecting patients; however, it is unclear whether the SRLs are sufficient to prevent induction of skin sensitization for workers as well. In this study, we compared acceptable surface limits (ASLs) derived from acceptable exposure levels (AELs) based on EC1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Serious cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by exposure to 3,5,6-tetrachloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)pyridine (TCMSP; CAS no. 13108-52-6) used as an antimicrobial agent for desk mats have been reported in Japan.

Objective: A quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of TCMSP contained in desk mats was performed retrospectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chemical disinfection of water provides significant public health benefits. However, disinfectants like chlorine can react with naturally occurring materials in the water to form disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Natural levels of iodine have been reported to be too low in some source waters to account for the levels of iodinated DBPs detected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Skin sensitization is an extremely important risk factor for occupational health and safety, and it would be desirable to set health-based exposure limits (HBELs) for the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) based on the skin sensitizing potencies of chemical. We attempted to set acceptable surface limits (ASLs) as HBELs for skin sensitizers in the workplace based on the local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a predictive method to provide estimates of relative potency and to contribute to risk assessment/risk management regarding skin sensitizing potency of chemicals and formulations as a stand-alone alternative test. In addition, LLNA is relatively rapid and cost-effective compared to the Buehler method (Guinea pig test), and confers important animal welfare benefits. CBA/J and BALB/c strains are widely commercially available and have been evaluated by formal LLNA validation studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: fwrite(): Write of 34 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 272

Backtrace:

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_write_close(): Failed to write session data using user defined save handler. (session.save_path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Unknown

Line Number: 0

Backtrace: