AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine whether initiating dual antiplatelet therapy early or delaying it is more effective and safer for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
  • After reviewing nine controlled trials involving over 40,000 patients, the findings indicated that delayed prasugrel initiation significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and was deemed the most effective strategy overall.
  • Although early prasugrel showed benefits in reducing various secondary cardiovascular outcomes, it increased the risk of bleeding, while delayed clopidogrel had a lower bleeding risk.

Article Abstract

Aims: Whether early or delayed dual antiplatelet therapy initiation is better in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is unclear. We assessed the evidence for comparing the efficacy and safety of early vs. delayed P2Y inhibitor initiation in NSTE-ACS.

Methods: The randomized controlled trials with available comparisons between early and delayed initiation of P2Y inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) in patients with NSTE-ACS until January 2021 were reviewed. The primary outcomes were trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, urgent coronary revascularization, and stroke. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted, ranking best treatments per outcome with -scores.

Results: A total of nine trials with intervention arms including early and delayed initiation of clopidogrel ( = 5), prasugrel ( = 8), or ticagrelor ( = 6) involving 40,096 patients were included. Early prasugrel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.40-0.87), delayed prasugrel (HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.43-0.84), and early ticagrelor (HR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.74-0.96) significantly reduced MACE compared with early clopidogrel, but increased bleeding risk. Delayed prasugrel ranked as the best treatment to reduce MACE (-score=0.80), early prasugrel to reduce all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, and stroke, and delayed clopidogrel to reduce bleeding (-score = 0.84). The risk of bias was low for all trials.

Conclusion: In patients with NSTE-ACS, delayed prasugrel initiation was the most effective strategy to reduce MACE. Although early prasugrel was the best option to reduce most secondary cardiovascular outcomes, it was associated with the highest bleeding risk. The opposite was found for delayed clopidogrel.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095971PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.862452DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

early delayed
20
delayed initiation
12
early prasugrel
12
delayed prasugrel
12
early
10
delayed
9
p2y inhibitors
8
patients non-st-segment
8
non-st-segment elevation
8
elevation acute
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!