Introduction: There are several potential causes of QRS-axis deviation in the ECG, but there is limited data on the prognostic significance of QRS-axis deviation in ACS patients.
Subjects And Methods: We evaluated the long-term prognostic significance of acute phase frontal plane QRS-axis deviation and its shift during hospital stay in ACS patients. A total of 1026 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three categories: normal (n = 823), left (n = 166) and right/extreme axis (n = 37).
Results: The median survival time was 9.0 years (95% CI 7.9-10.0) in the normal, 3.6 years (95% CI 2.4-4.7) in the left and 1.3 years (95% CI 0.2-2.4) in the right/extreme axis category. Both short and long-term all-cause mortality was lowest in the normal axis category and highest in the right/extreme axis category. Compared to normal axis, both admission phase QRS-axis deviation groups were independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality. When including left ventricular hypertrophy in the ECG, only the right/extreme axis retained its statistical significance (aHR 1.76; 95% CI 1.16-2.66, p = 0.007). Axis shift to another axis category had no effect on mortality.
Conclusion: In ACS patients, acute phase QRS-axis deviation was associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality. Among the axis deviation groups, right/extreme QRS-axis deviation was the strongest predictor of mortality in the multivariable analysis. Further studies are required to investigate to what extent this association is caused by pre-existing or by ACS-induced axis deviations. QRS-axis shift during hospital stay had no effect on all-cause mortality.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.04.007 | DOI Listing |
Heart Rhythm
November 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China; Clinical Research Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China; Human Phenome Institute of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Human Phenome, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Shantou, Guangdong, China. Electronic address:
Background: Electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB) inadequately predict left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony, complicating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidate selection.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the horizontal QRS axis for CRT response in heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB patterns.
Methods: The direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis were calculated using the net amplitudes in leads V and V.
Heart Rhythm
October 2024
First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland; Electrophysiology Laboratory, University Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland. Electronic address:
Background: QRS axis deviation and rS configuration in V6 affect the ability of V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT) criterion to discriminate capture type during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).
Objective: We hypothesized that combining RWPTs from lateral leads: I, aVL, V5, and V6 may better reflect left ventricular activation time and that such a global RWPT may be insensitive to changes in QRS configuration.
Methods: The analysis included 519 electrocardiograms (ECGs) with nonselective left bundle branch pacing (nsLBBP) and 176 ECGs with left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP).
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
January 2025
Division of Electrophysiology, Texas Health Heart and Vascular Specialists, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Introduction: It remains unclear if pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) may be minimized by standard pacing of the right ventricle (RV) at sites other than the RV apex. The purpose of this study is to compare the relative frequency of PICM in a population of patients paced at either the superficial RV mid septum (RVMS) or RV apex (RVA), and other outcomes that may differ between these sites.
Methods And Results: A retrospective evaluation was performed on all patients undergoing pacemaker implantation between 2011 and 2022.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Purpose: The study aims to assess cardiac synchrony under different left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and evaluate the relationship between different surface or intracardiac electrical parameters and mechanical synchrony.
Methods: Eighty-two patients with successful LBBAP were recruited. The electrical synchrony, evaluated by paced QRS duration (pQRSD) and Stim-LVAT (stimulus to left ventricular activation time), and mechanical synchrony, evaluated by the standard deviation of the time-to-peak contraction velocity in 12 left ventricular segments (Tsd-12-LV), were compared between groups in patients underwent LBBAP.
Heart Rhythm
September 2024
Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!