AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of a new osseoshaping tool based on first-user experiences during surgery and compare it with prior animal testing results.
  • The surgical procedures involved implant placements in patients with difficult bone conditions, and the data gathered included site evaluation and instrument handling.
  • Findings indicated that the tool was user-friendly, did not cause complications, reduced the need for multiple drilling instruments, and improved the preservation of bone structures while simplifying the surgical process.

Article Abstract

The main objectives of this work were to assess the efficiency, ease-of-use, and general performance of a novel osseoshaping tool based on first-user clinical experiences and to compare these observations with preclinical data generated in rodents using a miniaturized version of the instrument. All patients selected for the surgery presented challenging clinical conditions in terms of the quality and/or quantity of the available bone. The presented data were collected during the implant placement of 15 implants in 7 patients, and included implant recipient site (bone quality and quantity) and ridge evaluation, intra-operative handling of the novel instrument, and the evaluation of subsequent implant insertion. The instrument was easy to handle and was applied without any complications during the surgical procedure. Its use obviated the need for multiple drills and enabled adequate insertion torque in all cases. This biologically driven innovation in implant site preparation shows improvements in preserving vital anatomical and cellular structures as well as simplifying the surgical protocol with excellent ease-of-use and handling properties.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103213PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092536DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osteotomy tool
4
tool preserves
4
preserves bone
4
bone viability
4
viability evaluation
4
evaluation preclinical
4
preclinical clinical
4
clinical settings
4
settings main
4
main objectives
4

Similar Publications

Joint arthrodesis is a very common surgical approach in foot and ankle surgery at various anatomic levels. Several techniques have demonstrated the ability to provide successful fusion with appropriate preparation of the joint in question. With that in mind, the joint preparation, regardless of approach or instrumentation, is consistently the most time-consuming.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

New Productive Force: The Preliminary Report of First Craniofacial Surgical Robot IST Multicenter Clinical Trial in China.

J Craniofac Surg

January 2025

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Background: This paper presents the authors' team's research on a craniofacial surgical robot developed in China. Initiated in 2011 with government funding, the craniofacial surgical robot project was officially launched in Shanghai, developed jointly by the Ninth People's Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the Shanghai Jiao Tong University medical-engineering team. Currently, based on multiple rounds of model surgeries, animal experiments, and clinical trials, our team is applying for approval as a Class III medical device from the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The combination of hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has been proven safe and effective for addressing symptoms in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). As not every patient with dysplasia will require a hip arthroscopy to obtain desired clinical improvement in the setting of periacetabular osteotomy, a challenge is identifying which patients require adjacent procedures (either via arthroscopic or open) to fully treat their hip pathology. Even though labral repair is the most reported arthroscopic procedure in cases of hip dysplasia, I would suggest that labral treatment is the least likely helpful component of hip arthroscopy in these cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess the radiological outcomes and complications focusing on distal junctional failure (DJF) of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent thoracolumbar fixation with the use of offset sublaminar hooks (OSH) distally.

Methods: Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity database (2 sites). Inclusion criteria were age of at least 18 years, presence of a spinal deformity with thoraco-lumbar instrumentation ending distally with OSH (pelvis excluded), with minimum 2 years of follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare patient populations and outcomes in studies treating borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) with either hip arthroscopy or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO).

Methods: We conducted a literature review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify studies published after 2014 that reported patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after hip arthroscopy or PAO for BHD. Preoperative demographic characteristics, radiographic variables, operative findings, procedures, postoperative outcomes, and complications were recorded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!