AI Article Synopsis

  • Informing families about a patient's death is a tough job for clinicians, especially those caring for terminally ill patients, and there's been little research on the specific burdens they face during this process.
  • The study aimed to create and validate a new scale, the Death Pronouncement Burden Scale for oncology practice (DPBS-oncol), to measure the burden experienced by clinicians in Japan when pronouncing death.
  • The DPBS-oncol consists of 15 items and demonstrated high reliability and validity, showing it can effectively assess the challenges clinicians encounter during death pronouncements.

Article Abstract

Background: Informing families of a patient's death is one of the most challenging responsibilities of clinicians who provide care for terminally ill patients. Although death pronouncement can be a highly stressful event for clinicians, no previous study has reported qualitative characteristics of the burden experienced by clinicians related to death pronouncements. Moreover, no scale has been developed to assess this burden.

Objective: This study sought to develop a scale to evaluate clinicians' burden related to death pronouncement (Death Pronouncement Burden Scale for oncology practice [DPBS-oncol]) and examine its reliability and validity in Japan.

Methods: We presented the DPBS-oncol to clinicians involved in oncology practice and examined its reliability and discriminant validity. To investigate the test-retest reliability of the scale, the DPBS-oncol was presented a second time to a subsample of the clinicians.

Results: Factor analysis required a grouping of the 15 DPBS-oncol items into one factor. Cronbach's α coefficient of the total score of DPBS-oncol was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total score of DPBS-oncol was 0.89. Regarding discriminant validity, DPBS-oncol total score was moderately correlated with other available scales for assessing clinicians' attitudes to end-of-life care.

Conclusion: This study was the first to develop a scale to evaluate clinicians' burden related to death pronouncement. The DPBS-oncol, which includes 15 items, was validated and shown to have sufficient reliability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9081014PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2021.0082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

death pronouncement
20
oncology practice
12
total score
12
pronouncement burden
8
burden scale
8
scale oncology
8
develop scale
8
scale evaluate
8
evaluate clinicians'
8
clinicians' burden
8

Similar Publications

[Characteristics of postmortem changes in the brain].

Sud Med Ekspert

December 2024

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov, Moscow, Russia.

The study aimed to analyze the literature data on postmortem changes in the brain and their use to determine the time since death. The earliest manifestations of brain cell autolysis are detected by electron microscopy (15-20 minutes after death). The longer the postmortem period, the more morphofunctional changes in the brain are revealed by histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical studies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a devastating and fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CS can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications. The unique properties of cangrelor make it the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor for CS-AMI, in terms of both efficacy and safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We aimed to synthesize existing research to elucidate the underlying factors and causes responsible for the high prevalence of unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) occurring outside a hospital setting in Japan despite patients' Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) orders. We conducted a narrative review by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for English literature, and Google Scholar for Japanese literature. The key factors we identified included lack of documentation of resuscitation preferences, variation in the perception of other life-sustaining measures associated with DNAR, non-inclusion of the patient in discussions of goals of care, unlegislated and unstandardized DNAR orders, emergency medical service activation by the family or facility, the Fire Service Act that mandates life-saving measures irrespective of the presence of advance directives, fire department protocols and CPR decision-making, and death pronouncement authorization limited to physicians.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Circulation

November 2024

Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany (D.V., L.L., M.B., F.M.).

Article Synopsis
  • A meta-analysis of randomized, sham-controlled trials was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) in treating hypertension, involving 10 trials with a total of 2,478 patients.
  • The study found that RDN significantly lowered both 24-hour and office systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to sham procedures, without a notable difference in complications or changes in renal function.
  • Overall, RDN appears to be a safe and effective method for reducing blood pressure in patients with hypertension, although significant variability was noted among the studies analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated the PACAS risk model's ability to identify patients at high risk for severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) and predict future strokes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
  • It involved 26,384 patients aged 45-80, finding that 6.3% had severe ACAS at baseline and that higher PACAS scores correlated with increased incidences of stroke and CVD over roughly 70,000 patient-years of follow-up.
  • The PACAS model was confirmed to effectively discriminate and calibrate risk levels, indicating that patients with higher scores had a significantly higher prevalence of severe ACAS and related events during the follow-up period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!