Objectives: We aimed to determine whether non-A non-B aortic dissection (AD) differs in morphologic and haemodynamic properties from type B AD.
Methods: We simulated and compared haemodynamics of patients with acute type B or acute non-A non-B AD by means of computational fluid dynamics. Wall pressure and wall shear stress (WSS) in both the true lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL) at early, mid- and late systole were evaluated. Morphology, WSS and the FL/TL wall pressure ratio were compared between groups.
Results: Nineteen patients (type B, n = 7; non-A non-B, n = 12) were included. The median age (51 [46, 67] vs 53 [50, 63] years; P = 0.71) and a complicated course (14% vs 33%; P = 0.6) did not differ between the type B group and the non-A non-B group. However, the median entry tear width was increased in the non-A non-B group (9.7 [7.3, 12.7] vs 16.3 [11.9, 24.9] mm; P = 0.010). Streamlines showed, in patients with non-A non-B AD, blood from the TL flowed into the FL via the entry tear. Prevalence of a FL/TL wall pressure ratio >1.0 (type B versus non-A non-B) at early, mid- and late systole was 57% vs 83% (P = 0.31), 43% vs 83% (P = 0.13) and 57% vs 75% (P = 0.62), respectively. WSS did not differ between the groups.
Conclusions: The increased FL/TL wall pressure ratio observed during systole in non-A non-B AD may beget a complicated presentation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9486891 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac138 | DOI Listing |
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis
September 2024
Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, "Madonna del Soccorso" Hospital, AST-Ascoli Piceno.
Non-A non-B aortic dissection is considered a rare nosological entity, included in the Stanford classification, representing a small percentage of the total aortic dissections that occur annually. Regarding this form, the literature reports a more complicated disease course compared to other types of dissection. We describe the case of a 76-year-old patient who accessed the triage section of an emergency department for a polytrauma picture and, after surgical treatment of a leg fracture, received a diagnosis of non-A non-B aortic dissection, "localized" to the arch and incidentally detected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
December 2024
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Semmelweis Aortic Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Front Cardiovasc Med
July 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Objective: Acute aortic dissection remains a serious emergency in the field of cardiovascular medicine and a challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons. In the present study, we seek to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques in the repair of type A acute aortic dissection.
Methods: Between April 2015 and May 2023, 213 patients (82 women, aged: 63.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
August 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinic Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria.
Ann Vasc Surg
January 2025
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes achieved after implementing a treatment strategy for non-A non-B (NANB) (B 1-2 D according to the latest consensus document of the Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) acute aortic dissection (AAD)).
Methods: This retrospective observational study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. All cases of NANB AAD (B 1-2 D) treated at our institution between January 2016 and December 2022 were reviewed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!