Context: Energy expenditure predictive equations can generate inaccurate estimates for overweight or obese individuals.
Objective: The objective of this review was to determine which predictive equations for resting energy expenditure (REE) and total energy expenditure (TEE) have the lowest bias and the highest precision in adults with overweight and obesity.
Data Sources: Searches were performed in January 2022 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and the gray literature databases.
Data Extraction: Meta-analyses were performed with equations included in more than 1 study. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model and the I2 statistic were used to quantify heterogeneity in the quantitative analyses. The Egger test was performed to assess potential publication biases, and metaregressions were conducted to explore the heterogeneity. Findings were presented separated by participants' body mass index classification (overweight and obesity).
Data Analysis: Sixty-one studies were included. The FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) equation, which uses only body weight in its formula, showed the lowest bias in estimating REE (mean difference [MD] = 8.97 kcal; 95% CI = -26.99; 44.94). In the subgroup analysis for individuals with obesity, the Lazzer (2007) equation showed the lowest bias (MD = 4.70 kcal; 95% CI = -95.45; 104.86). The Harris-Benedict equation (1919) showed the highest precision values for individuals with overweight (60.65%) and for individuals with obesity (62.54%). Equations with body composition data showed the highest biases. The equation proposed by the Institute of Medicine (2005) showed the lowest bias (MD = -2.52 kcal; 95% CI = -125.94; 120.90) in estimating the TEE. Most analyses showed high heterogeneity (I2 > 90%). There was no evidence of publication bias.
Conclusion: For individuals with overweight, the FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) and the Harris-Benedict equations (1919) showed the lowest bias and the highest precision in predicting the REE, respectively. For individuals with obesity, the Harris-Benedict equation (1919) showed the highest precision and the Lazzer equation (2007) showed the lowest bias. More studies are needed on predictive equations to estimate the TEE.
Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021262969.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuac031 | DOI Listing |
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
December 2024
Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Objective: To comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of uterine artery embolization (UAE), focused ultrasound (HIFU), radiofrequency ablation (RFT), and laparoscopic/laparotomic surgery in the conservative treatment of uterine fibroids DATA SOURCES: The research was performed via electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, using the PRISMA standards.
Methods Of Study Selection: The network included 10 randomized trials between 2000 and 2024 and 1002 randomized subjects.
Tabulation: The Network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out with subroutine netmeta on R.
Eur J Pain
February 2025
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background: Epidemiological surveys have monitored chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and investigated associated factors in Denmark for more than 20 years. This study aimed to analyse CNCP prevalence in the Danish population from 2000 to 2023 and its associations with mental health status and loneliness.
Methods: Population-based surveys were conducted between 2000 and 2023.
Cureus
November 2024
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Aims And Objectives: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two AI models - OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo (San Francisco, CA) and Meta's LLaMA 3.1 (Menlo Park, CA) - when answering a standardized set of pediatric radiology questions. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall accuracy of each model, while the secondary objective was to assess their performance within subsections.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthod Craniofac Res
December 2024
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dental School/Medical Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
The primary objective was to systematically assess the prevalence, incidence and risk factors of WSLs with orthodontic treatment. The secondary objective was to compare the prevalence of WSLs between conventional fixed appliances (CFA) and other appliances, as well as with no treatment. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACs, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Psychopharmacol
December 2024
From the NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Wilmington, DE.
Background: Extensive experience with antidepressant clinical trials indicates that interrater reliability (IRR) must be maintained to achieve reliable clinical trial results. Contract research organizations have generally accepted 6 points of rating disparity between study site raters and central "master raters" as concordant, in part because of the personnel turnover and variability within many contract research organizations. We developed and tested an "insourced" model using a small, dedicated team of rater program managers (RPMs), to determine whether 3 points of disparity could successfully be demonstrated as a feasible standard for rating concordance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!