A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prognostic value of node-to-primary tumor maximum standardized uptake value ratio in T1-4N1-3M0 non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. | LitMetric

Background: This study aimed to identify whether NTR is the independent risk factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT).

Methods: We retrospectively studied 106 T1-4N1-3M0 non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with cCRT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVTumor) of the primary tumor and the metastatic lymph nodes (SUVLN) were measured. The prognostic significance of NTR for predicting PFS and OS was assessed. A multi-adjusted spline regression model was conducted to provide more precise estimates and examine the shape of the associations between NTR and the risk of progression.

Results: From 2012 to 2017, 106 eligible patients were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 15.3 months (3.5-44.6 months). We determined the maximizing area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve was at an NTR of 0.73 for predicting PFS. The two-year PFS was significantly lower in the high-NTR group (35.7% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.02) and two-year OS (43.4% vs. 61.1%, P = 0.03 was also significantly worse. Multivariable analysis revealed that only NTR was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 10.04, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 4.19, P = 0.03). The restricted cubic spline regression model showed that NTR had a non-linear relationship with log relative risk for progression.

Conclusion: NTR was an independent risk factor for predicting PFS and OS in T1-4N1-3M0 non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with cCRT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278701PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001576DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients treated
16
t1-4n1-3m0 non-small
12
non-small cell
12
cell lung
12
lung cancer
12
cancer patients
12
ntr independent
12
predicting pfs
12
maximum standardized
8
standardized uptake
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!