AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the Turkish version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ-T) for its effectiveness in identifying oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD).
  • Using a sample of 170 adults, including OPD patients and healthy controls, the researchers assessed the questionnaire's reliability and established a cutoff score for clinical use.
  • Results showed high internal consistency and test-retest reliability, with a cutoff value of 174 demonstrating significant sensitivity and specificity, confirming the SSQ-T as a valid tool for assessing OPD severity.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ-T) and calculate a cutoff value to help clinicians to suspect/predict oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD).

Method: The original questionnaire was translated into Turkish by two bilingual English Turkish translators. The study included 170 Turkish adult subjects. Half of the participants were patients presenting with OPD, and half were healthy controls. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was administered to all subjects. Patients were evaluated using the Turkish Penetration Aspiration Scale and the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale. Additionally, the final version of the SSQ-T questionnaire and the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool were administered to all subjects.

Results: Internal consistency was high on all questions (Cronbach's α = .974). Test-retest reliability was also high (intraclass correlation coefficient = .975, < .001; 95% confidence interval [.948-.988]). The SSQ-T score range was 0-1,240 for all participants, 57-1,240 for the patients with OPD, and 0-152 for the healthy controls. The cutoff value was 174 with 85.96% sensitivity and 99.12% specificity.

Conclusion: The SSQ-T was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable assessment to assess the self-perceived severity of OPD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00268DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

validity reliability
8
reliability turkish
8
turkish version
8
version sydney
8
sydney swallow
8
swallow questionnaire
8
healthy controls
8
turkish
7
questionnaire
4
questionnaire purpose
4

Similar Publications

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins play critical roles in regulating many cellular events. Antibodies targeting site-specific PTMs are essential tools for detecting and enriching PTMs at sites of interest. However, fundamental difficulties in molecular recognition of both PTM and surrounding peptide sequence have hindered the efficient generation of highly sequence-specific anti-PTM antibodies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the digitalization of modern society, extending digital transformation to daily life and psychological evaluation and treatment. However, the development of competencies and literacy in handling digital technology has not kept pace, resulting in a significant disparity among individuals. Existing measurements of digital literacy were developed before widespread information and communications technology device adoption, mainly focusing on one's perceptions of their proficiency and the utility of device operation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a common intracranial tumor that affects patients' quality of life. Reliable imaging techniques for tumor volume assessment are essential for guiding management decisions. The study aimed to compare the ABC/2 method to the gold standard planimetry method for volumetric assessment of VS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the diagnostic capability of Pöschl reformations created from temporal bone CT (TBCT) and high-resolution noncontrast CT head exams (HR-NECTH) to detect and classify superior semicircular canal (SSC) abnormalities.

Study Design: Retrospective case review.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Neurocritically ill patients are at high risk for developing delirium, which can worsen the long-term outcomes of this vulnerable population. However, existing delirium assessment tools do not account for neurologic deficits that often interfere with conventional testing and are therefore unreliable in neurocritically ill patients. We aimed to determine the accuracy and predictive validity of the Fluctuating Mental Status Evaluation (FMSE), a novel delirium screening tool developed specifically for neurocritically ill patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!