Objective: Ambulance ramping involves a patient remaining under paramedic care until a hospital emergency department bed becomes available. This study examined whether negative ramping experiences (verbal abuse, physical abuse, compromised patient care, and patient fatality) contribute to relatively high levels of depression, anxiety, stress, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in paramedics.

Method: Ninety Australian paramedics ( = 37.68, = 10.73; 52.2% male) completed an online survey.

Results: Path analysis found that negative ramping experiences were positively associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD. Interactions indicated that negative ramping experiences predicted greater depression, stress, and PTSD among paramedics with higher, but not lower, work-related self-efficacy. All interactions with resilience were nonsignificant.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that policymakers should aim to reduce ambulance ramping, and that future research could fruitfully investigate the mental health benefits of training programs that include strategies to minimize paramedics' feelings of powerlessness, frustration, and self-blame, during ramping. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tra0001241DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ambulance ramping
12
negative ramping
12
ramping experiences
12
mental health
8
depression anxiety
8
anxiety stress
8
stress ptsd
8
ramping
6
ramping predicts
4
predicts poor
4

Similar Publications

Patient care on the ramp: Who is legally responsible?

Emerg Med Australas

February 2025

Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research at Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ambulance ramping, the delay to transfer of a patient arriving at an ED by ambulance into an ED treatment space and handover of care to ED clinicians, is a problem in all Australian states and territories and New Zealand. It is a symptom of ED overcrowding and access block and has been associated with adverse health outcomes for some patient groups. The questions arise, who might be legally responsible for the care of patients who are ramped and does their physical location matter? The short answers are 'everyone' and 'no', however, whether there will be a breach of duty depends on the reasonableness of responses and resource allocation considerations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The conveyor belt for older people nearing the end of life.

Intern Med J

August 2024

Australian Centre for Health Law Research, School of Law, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Article Synopsis
  • * This contributes to the hospital crisis, causing issues like overcrowded emergency departments and reduced capacity for elective surgeries.
  • * The authors suggest improving care by focusing on detailed goal discussions and shared decision-making about treatment, which could better empower patients and improve healthcare outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

'Ramping' is a commonly used term in contemporary Australian healthcare. It is also a part of the public and political zeitgeist. However, its precise definition varies among sources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!