AI Article Synopsis

  • New evidence supports the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsy as a noninvasive method for profiling cancer mutations, emphasizing the need for more data on the clinical validity of cfDNA testing.
  • A study involving 398 cancer patients compared the FoundationOne Liquid Analysis (F1LA) and standard NGS techniques, revealing high success rates and significant clinical impact, particularly in detecting actionable genetic alterations.
  • The findings suggest that while further research is required to refine patient selection, NGS F1LA demonstrates potential as an effective tool in oncology for noninvasive cancer detection and treatment options.

Article Abstract

Background: Recently, new evidence of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsy utility in clinical practice has been developed. This assay is emerging as a new promising tool to use as a noninvasive biomarker for cancer mutation profiling. Additional data supporting the clinical validity of cell free DNA (cfDNA) based testing is necessary to inform optimal use of these assays in the clinic.

Materials And Methods: A total of 398 cancer patients were analyzed by FoundationOne Liquid Analysis (F1LA), a genomic profiling assay and by standard NGS diagnostic ThermoFisher platform. The association between diagnostic technique was evaluated using a Poisson regression model. FoundationOne Liquid (F1L) and FoundationOne Liquid CDx (F1LCDx) detect 70 and 324 cancer-related genes alterations, respectively, including genomic signatures tumor fraction, blood tumor mutational burden (only for the 324 genes version), and microsatellite instability high status. Both assays used a single DNA extraction method to obtain cfDNA. The real-life clinical impact and feasibility of F1L and F1LCDx were evaluated across different solid tumors in our department.

Results: Between 1 January 2019 and 28 February 2021, 398 samples of different tumor types from 398 patients were analyzed (overall success rate: 92%, in FoundationOne Liquid CDx Analysis success rate: 97%). Most frequent molecular alterations were (74), (40), (39), (23). The comprehensive clinical impact of F1LA compared with standard diagnostic was 64.7% 22.1% [risk ratio (RR) = 2.94;  < 0.001] and the potential clinical impact was 58.6% 11.0% (RR = 5.32;  < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, some clinical cases were selected, in which F1LA detected actionable alterations offering an unexpected therapeutic choice.

Conclusions: Although additional studies are needed to better select patients and setting, NGS F1LA is a useful, noninvasive, and repeatable assay to guide therapeutic choice in oncology. It provides a snapshot of cancer heterogeneity profile that could be incorporated in routinely clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082754PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359221096878DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foundationone liquid
16
solid tumors
8
patients analyzed
8
liquid cdx
8
clinical impact
8
success rate
8
liquid
5
comprehensive genome
4
genome profiling
4
profiling generation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!