Comparative study on the dynamic properties of lightweight porous concrete.

RSC Adv

Transport Barracks Section, Ninth Brigade of Air Force Radar Shijiazhuang 100720 China.

Published: April 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Two types of lightweight porous concrete were developed: expanded polystyrene concrete (EPSC) and ceramics-cement based porous material (CCPM), both derived from C60 concrete.
  • Dynamic mechanical experiments were conducted using a 100 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) to analyze the strength, deformation, and impact properties of these materials under varying strain rates.
  • Results indicate that both materials exhibit strain rate sensitivity, with CCPM outperforming EPSC in strength and toughness, suggesting better potential for use in civil defense applications.

Article Abstract

In this paper, two types of lightweight porous concrete material, expanded polystyrene concrete (EPSC) and ceramics-cement based porous material (CCPM) have been prepared on the base of C60 concrete. The dynamic mechanical experiments of lightweight porous concretes have been carried out by 100 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) improved by wave shaping technology. The dynamic properties, including strength properties, deformation properties, impact toughness and energy absorption properties, of lightweight porous concretes have been analyzed comparatively, and its application prospects have been discussed. The results show that the two types of lightweight porous concretes are strain rate sensitive. Dynamic compression strength increases with strain rate; the correlation between the peak strain, ultimate strain of lightweight porous concrete and strain rate can be expressed by quadratic polynomial; under the impact loading, the impact toughness of lightweight porous concretes increases with strain rate, the amount of absorbed energy increases with the average incident energy change rate, moreover, the relation between the impact toughness and strain rate, and that between the amount of absorbed energy and the average incident energy change rate can both be expressed by exponential functions; compared with EPSC, CCPM has better properties in terms of strength, deformation, impact toughness and energy absorption. Those advantages are more obvious with high strain rate. Therefore, CCPM has more vast application prospects in civil defense projects than EPSC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079883PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00082dDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lightweight porous
28
strain rate
24
porous concretes
16
impact toughness
16
porous concrete
12
dynamic properties
8
properties lightweight
8
porous
8
types lightweight
8
toughness energy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!