A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review. | LitMetric

β-Blocker Use and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review.

Kidney Med

Department of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis Veterans Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.

Published: May 2022

Rationale & Objective: There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than poorly dialyzable β-blockers.

Study Design: A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using data from the selected studies.

Setting & Study Populations: Participants were from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. The mean ages of participants ranged from 55.9-75.7 years.

Selection Criteria For Studies: We searched the Ovid MEDLINE database from 1990 to September 2020. Studies without adult hemodialysis participants and without comparisons of at least 2 β-blockers of different dialyzability were excluded.

Data Extraction: Baseline and adjusted outcome data were extracted from each study.

Analytical Approach: Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios using fully adjusted models from individual studies.

Results: Four cohort studies were included. Pooling fully adjusted models, highly dialyzable β-blockers did not influence mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; I = 0.84) compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers but were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I = 0.35). Only 1 study reported on adverse events. Intradialytic hypotension was more common in those on carvedilol (a poorly dialyzable β-blocker) compared with those on metoprolol (a highly dialyzable β-blocker; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11).

Limitations: No randomized controlled trials were identified. Each study used different analytic methods and different definitions for outcomes. Classifications of β-blockers varied. Only 1 study reported on adverse events.

Conclusions: Pooled data suggest highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with similar mortality events and fewer cardiovascular events compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9079357PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100460DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dialyzable β-blockers
20
highly dialyzable
16
systematic review
12
β-blockers associated
12
cardiovascular events
12
β-blockers
8
dialyzable
8
fully adjusted
8
adjusted models
8
compared dialyzable
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!