Objectives: To evaluate retention, efficacy, and safety of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept over 2 years in patients with moderate-to-severe RA in the Abatacept SubCutaneOus in Routine clinical practicE (ASCORE) study.

Methods: Patients with RA who initiated SC abatacept 125 mg once weekly were enrolled in the international, observational, prospective multicentre ASCORE study into biologic-naïve or ≥ 1 prior biologic failure cohorts.

Primary Endpoint: abatacept retention rate at 2 years. Secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with good/moderate EULAR response rates based on DAS28 (ESR), low disease activity and/or remission according to DAS28 (ESR; ≤ 3.2/ < 2.6), SDAI (≤ 11/ ≤ 3.3), CDAI (≤ 10/ ≤ 2.8), and Boolean criteria. Retention rate by baseline serostatus was evaluated post hoc.

Results: Overall, 47% of patients remained on abatacept for 2 years, irrespective of treatment line. Higher abatacept retention rates were associated with lower prior biologic exposure. Generally, clinical outcomes showed that the proportion of patients with low disease activity/remission was higher in biologic-naïve patients (vs biologic-failure) and similar in those with 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologic failures. In patients on treatment at 2 years, good/moderate EULAR response rates of ~ 80% were consistently noted irrespective of prior biologic exposure. Across treatment lines, retention was greater in patients with seropositive (vs seronegative) RA. Patients with rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibody single-positive RA who were bio-naïve had higher retention than patients who were bio-experienced.

Conclusions: In the ASCORE study, SC abatacept retention was 47% at 2 years with good clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting. Abatacept retention and clinical response rates were higher in patients who received abatacept as an earlier- versus later-line biologic drug treatment and in those with seropositive RA.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02090556.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287226PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06176-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subcutaneous abatacept
8
ascore study
8
abatacept
5
retention subcutaneous
4
abatacept treatment
4
treatment rheumatoid
4
rheumatoid arthritis
4
arthritis real-world
4
real-world ascore
4
study international
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To determine if higher serum exposure during subcutaneous (SC) abatacept treatment was associated with an increased infection risk in adult patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Data from AVERT-2 (Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment-2, NCT02504268), a randomized, placebo-controlled study in anticitrullinated protein antibody- positive patients with early RA, were analyzed. A post hoc population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Morphea, or localized scleroderma, is an autoimmune disease marked by excessive collagen buildup in the skin, with unclear causes that may include genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors.
  • Advances in medicine suggest genetic and epigenetic influences may significantly impact the disease's risk and progression, highlighting the role of factors like microRNAs and DNA methylation.
  • New treatment options, including biological therapies and JAK inhibitors, show promise based on case studies, underscoring the need for further exploration of morphea's pathogenesis and treatment strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept and standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) over 52 weeks.

Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, patients with treatment-refractory IIM received SC abatacept (125 mg weekly) + SOC (abatacept group) or placebo + SOC (placebo group) (NCT02971683). A 24-week double-blind period was followed by an open-label period to assess outcomes from continued therapy with abatacept and initiation with abatacept (placebo-to-abatacept switch group) from 24 to 52 weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Subcutaneous vs intravenous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease. National multicentre study of 397 patients.

Semin Arthritis Rheum

October 2024

Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Araba, Vitoria, Spain; Rheumatology Department, Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain. Electronic address:

Background: Evidence on abatacept (ABA) utility for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is growing. Clinical trials have shown equivalence in subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of ABA for articular manifestations. However, this has not been studied in respiratory outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluating [Ac]Ac-FAPI-46 for the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma in mice.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

November 2024

Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Purpose: Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) is an emerging theranostic target that is highly expressed on cancer-associated fibroblasts and on certain tumor cells including sarcoma. We investigated the anti-tumor efficacy of [Ac]Ac-FAPI-46 as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in immunocompetent murine models of sarcoma sensitive or resistant to ICB.

Methods: [Ga]Ga- and [Ac]Ac-FAPI-46 were tested in subcutaneous FAP+ FSA fibrosarcoma bearing C3H/Sed/Kam mice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!