Particle emissions from mobile sources: Discussion of ultrafine particle emissions and definition.

J Aerosol Sci

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.

Published: January 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • There is currently no universally accepted definition of ultrafine particles (UFP), leading to inconsistencies in their classification, particularly regarding size cut points and measurement methods.
  • Different definitions focus on particle number, mass, or lung deposition area, which can yield varying results based on the chosen criteria.
  • The authors propose three new metrics for UFP measurement—UFP-N (total number), UFP-M (total mass), and UFP-S (surface area)—all using a standardized cut point below 500 nm to improve clarity and consistency in research related to UFP exposure and health effects.

Article Abstract

There is no universally agreed upon definition for ultrafine particles (UFP). Commonly used definitions for UFP are either particle number below 100 nm or total particle number, but without an agreed upon lower cut point. For example, a lower cut point of 3 nm compared to 10 nm could result in a substantially higher count. Another definition for UFP is total particle mass but without a commonly agreed upon aerodynamic diameter upper cut point, e.g., below 100 nm, 200 nm, 300 nm, etc. Yet another definition is lung deposited surface area weighted by lung deposition fraction, found mainly in the particle mobility diameter range from 20 to 400 nm. It is clear from these definitions that there are inconsistencies in the way UFP is used and defined in the literature. Sometimes these metrics are well correlated, sometimes not. In this paper we suggest three exposure metrics: UFP-N, UFP-M, and UFP-S, that we believe will add clarity. These metrics represent total number, mass, and surface area below 500 nm, respectively. For surface area and mass, the 500 nm cut point can be either aerodynamic or mobility diameter depending upon measurement methodology. For all metrics, this cut point captures nearly all of the primary particle emissions from mobile sources. Furthermore, UFP-N would include a lower cut point of 3-6 nm and would not require an upper size cut point because there is very little particle number above 500 nm or even above 100 nm. Thus, our definition of UFP-N is consistent with the current definition of ultrafine number except for, importantly, the specification of a lower cut point. These exposure metrics can help facilitate consistency in the characterization of both short- and long-term UFP ambient exposures and associated health effects in epidemiological studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9074695PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105881DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cut point
32
lower cut
16
particle emissions
12
particle number
12
surface area
12
particle
8
emissions mobile
8
mobile sources
8
definition ultrafine
8
total particle
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!