AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the outcomes of a new treatment approach (reverse sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, mastectomy, and reconstruction) for locally advanced breast cancer compared to the standard treatment sequence.
  • In a retrospective analysis of 222 female patients under 65, results showed no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two methods, with 5-year OS rates of 88.4% for the reverse sequence and 81.5% for the standard.
  • Patients in the reverse sequence group experienced shorter overall treatment times, and complication rates were similar between groups, suggesting that this alternative can be safely considered for certain patients.

Article Abstract

Background: The reverse sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, mastectomy then immediate breast reconstruction is currently proposed for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Few studies have compared it to the standard sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy with or without differed reconstruction. Our study compares overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survivals of breast cancer patients treated with reverse sequence compared to the standard technique.

Methods: In this retrospective, single center study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in France, patients were included if: female, age <65y, had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiotherapy, and were M0. Outcomes for patients treated by reverse sequence (RS) are compared to those for patients treated by standard sequence (ST). Data was collected from medical records.

Results: From January 2009 to April 2018, 222 eligible patients were treated, 46 by RS and 176 by ST. Mean follow-up was 61.7 months. Five-year OS and RFS did not differ between groups. 5-yr OS: 88.4% 95%CI [74.1-95.0] for RS and 81.5% 95%CI [74.0-87.0] for ST (P = 0.4412); 5-yr RFS: 78.3% 95%CI [61.9-88.3] for RS and 70.1% 95%CI [62.2-76.7] for ST (P = 0.3003). Overall treatment time was significantly shorter in the RS group, and the rate of severe surgical complications did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: For locally advanced breast cancer patients with an indication for radiation therapy the reverse sequence offers similar safety and efficacy results as the standard treatment while allowing immediate breast reconstruction. However, careful patient selection is necessary, particularly with regard to preoperative lymph node invasion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reverse sequence
20
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
16
breast cancer
16
patients treated
16
locally advanced
12
advanced breast
12
sequence compared
12
compared standard
12
safety efficacy
8
sequence neoadjuvant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!