A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Interobserver Variability in CT-based Morphologic Tumor Response Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases. | LitMetric

Interobserver Variability in CT-based Morphologic Tumor Response Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Radiol Imaging Cancer

From the Department of Surgery (N.J.W., R.K., G.K.) and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (J.H.T.M.v.W., I.M.G.C.N., F.S., I.O.A., S.S.K.S.P., M.R.W.E., J.S.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology (K.B., C.J.A.P.) and Department of Surgery (S.v.D., T.M.v.G., R.J.S.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (M.J.v.A., J.J.H.); Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium (T.C.); Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (C.H.C.D.); Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany (C.H.C.D.); Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.F.G.); Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (D.G., C.V.); Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (K.P.d.J., J.M.K.); Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands (M.S.L.L.); Department of Interventional Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands (I.Q.M.); Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands (G.A.P.); Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (A.M.R.); Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (T.M.R.); Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.H.W.d.W.); Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.J.A.P.); and Department of Health, SAS Institute, Huizen, the Netherlands (J.H.).

Published: May 2022

Purpose To evaluate interobserver variability in the morphologic tumor response assessment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) managed with systemic therapy and to assess the relation of morphologic response with gene mutation status, targeted therapy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 measurements. Materials and Methods Participants with initially unresectable CRLM receiving different systemic therapy regimens from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included in this prospective imaging study. Three radiologists independently assessed morphologic tumor response on baseline and first follow-up CT scans according to previously published criteria. Two additional radiologists evaluated disagreement cases. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using Fleiss κ. On the basis of the majority of individual radiologic assessments, the final morphologic tumor response was determined. Finally, the relation of morphologic tumor response and clinical prognostic parameters was assessed. Results In total, 153 participants (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-71]; 101 men) with 306 CT scans comprising 2192 CRLM were included. Morphologic assessment performed by the three radiologists yielded 86 (56%) agreement cases and 67 (44%) disagreement cases (including four major disagreement cases). Overall interobserver agreement between the panel radiologists on morphology groups and morphologic response categories was moderate (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.58 and κ = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.60). Optimal morphologic response was particularly observed in patients treated with bevacizumab ( = .001) and in patients with mutation ( = .04). No evidence of a relationship between RECIST 1.1 and morphologic response was found ( = .61). Conclusion Morphologic tumor response assessment following systemic therapy in participants with CRLM demonstrated considerable interobserver variability. Tumor Response, Observer Performance, CT, Liver, Metastases, Oncology, Abdomen/Gastrointestinal Clinical trial registration no. NCT02162563 © RSNA, 2022.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9152692PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rycan.210105DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tumor response
28
morphologic tumor
24
morphologic response
16
interobserver variability
12
response
12
response assessment
12
liver metastases
12
systemic therapy
12
disagreement cases
12
morphologic
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!