AI Article Synopsis

  • Rectal suction biopsy (RSB) is essential for diagnosing Hirschsprung disease (HD), and calretinin staining is gaining popularity due to its ease of use and comparable accuracy to traditional methods like acetylcholinesterase (AChE).
  • This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of calretinin to AChE in RSB specimens examined by both inexperienced and experienced pathologists, revealing that calretinin provided superior sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing HD among inexperienced pathologists.
  • The findings suggested that calretinin staining should be the preferred standard for diagnosing HD in RSB, as it showed higher accuracy and interobserver agreement compared to AChE for less experienced medical professionals.

Article Abstract

Rectal suction biopsy (RSB) is a gold standard for diagnosing Hirschsprung disease (HD). Calretinin staining of RSB is increasingly used by experienced pathologists due to non-complex examination and comparable diagnostic accuracy with acetylcholinesterase (AChE). However, the diagnostic accuracy of calretinin examined by unexperienced pathologists remains to be elucidated. Therefore, we aim to compare diagnostic accuracy of calretinin with AChE on RSB for diagnosing HD when examined by unexperienced pathologists. We prospectively analyzed sections from RSB stained with AChE + HE and calretinin. Blinded examination was done by five unexperienced pathologists (pathology residents) and three experienced pathologists (senior pediatric gastro-enterology pathologists) assessing for the presence of HD. Cases for the study included ones proven to be HD on resection specimens and cases without HD. Diagnostic accuracy was determined calculating area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and posttest probability. Fleiss' kappa analysis was performed to assess interobserver agreement between reviewers. Eleven of 18 included patients (61%) were diagnosed with HD. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of unexperienced pathologists, calretinin versus AChE + HE showed sensitivity of 80.0% versus 74.5% and specificity of 100% versus 65.4%, AUC of 0.87 (0.78-0.96) versus 0.59 (0.45-0.72). Unexperienced pathologists showed substantial agreement with calretinin (kappa 0.72 [0.61-0.84]) and fair agreement with AChE + HE (kappa 0.34 [0.23-0.44]). We found calretinin having higher diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing HD compared to AChE + HE when examined by unexperienced pathologists. Therefore, we recommend to use calretinin as the standard technique for staining RSB in diagnosing HD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343274PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03334-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic accuracy
28
unexperienced pathologists
28
examined unexperienced
16
accuracy calretinin
12
pathologists
10
calretinin
9
rectal suction
8
hirschsprung disease
8
staining rsb
8
experienced pathologists
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!