AI Article Synopsis

  • - Artificial intelligence, specifically deep learning (DL), shows potential to enhance the accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), primarily as a supportive tool for doctors rather than a fully autonomous system.
  • - In a study involving 240 patients, physicians’ diagnostic accuracy improved when interpreting MPI with access to explainable DL predictions (AUC 0.779) compared to those who relied solely on standard methods (AUC 0.747).
  • - The integration of DL results led to a significant overall improvement in diagnostic performance, with a net reclassification improvement of 17.2%, although the degree of benefit varied among different physicians based on their acceptance of the technology.

Article Abstract

Artificial intelligence may improve accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) but will likely be implemented as an aid to physician interpretation rather than an autonomous tool. Deep learning (DL) has high standalone diagnostic accuracy for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but its influence on physician interpretation is unknown. We assessed whether access to explainable DL predictions improves physician interpretation of MPI. We selected a representative cohort of patients who underwent MPI with reference invasive coronary angiography. Obstructive CAD, defined as stenosis ≥50% in the left main artery or ≥70% in other coronary segments, was present in half of the patients. We used an explainable DL model (CAD-DL), which was previously developed in a separate population from different sites. Three physicians interpreted studies first with clinical history, stress, and quantitative perfusion, then with all the data plus the DL results. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). In total, 240 patients with a median age of 65 y (interquartile range 58-73) were included. The diagnostic accuracy of physician interpretation with CAD-DL (AUC 0.779) was significantly higher than that of physician interpretation without CAD-DL (AUC 0.747, = 0.003) and stress total perfusion deficit (AUC 0.718, < 0.001). With matched specificity, CAD-DL had higher sensitivity when operating autonomously compared with readers without DL results ( < 0.001), but not compared with readers interpreting with DL results ( = 0.122). All readers had numerically higher accuracy with CAD-DL, with AUC improvement 0.02-0.05, and interpretation with DL resulted in overall net reclassification improvement of 17.2% (95% CI 9.2%-24.4%, < 0.001). Explainable DL predictions lead to meaningful improvements in physician interpretation; however, the improvement varied across the readers, reflecting the acceptance of this new technology. This technique could be implemented as an aid to physician diagnosis, improving the diagnostic accuracy of MPI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635672PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.263686DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physician interpretation
28
diagnostic accuracy
16
cad-dl auc
12
deep learning
8
physician
8
improves physician
8
interpretation
8
myocardial perfusion
8
perfusion imaging
8
implemented aid
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!