Purpose: To demonstrate that artificial intelligence (AI) can detect and correctly localise retrospectively visible cancers that were missed and diagnosed as interval cancers (false negative (FN) and minimal signs (MS) interval cancers), and to characterise AI performance on non-visible occult and true interval cancers.

Method: Prior screening mammograms from N = 2,396 women diagnosed with interval breast cancer between March 2006 and May 2018 in north-western Germany were analysed with an AI system, producing a model score for all studies. All included studies previously underwent independent radiological review at a mammography reference centre to confirm interval cancer classification. Model score distributions were visualised with histograms. We computed the proportion and accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CI) of retrospectively visible and true interval cancers detected and correctly localised by AI at different operating points representing recall rates < 3%. Clinicopathological characteristics of retrospectively visible cancers detected by AI and not were compared using the Chi-squared test and binary logistic regression.

Results: Following radiological review, 15.6% of the interval cancer cases were categorised as FN, 19.5% MS, 11.4% occult, and 53.4% true interval cancers. At an operating point of 99.0% specificity, AI could detect and correctly localise 27.5% (95% CI: 23.3-32.3%), and 12.2% (95% CI: 9.5-15.5%) of the FN and MS cases on the prior mammogram, respectively. 228 of these retrospectively visible cases were advanced/metastatic at diagnosis; 21.1% (95% CI: 16.3-26.8%) were found by AI on the screening mammogram. Increased likelihood of detection of retrospectively visible cancers with AI was observed for lower-grade carcinomas and those with involved lymph nodes at diagnosis. Among true interval cancers, AI could detect and correctly localise in the screening mammogram where subsequent malignancies would appear in 2.8% (95% CI: 2.0-3.9%) of cases.

Conclusions: AI can support radiologists by detecting a greater number of carcinomas, subsequently decreasing the interval cancer rate and the number of advanced and metastatic cancers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110321DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interval cancers
16
retrospectively visible
8
diagnosed interval
8
true interval
8
model score
8
interval
7
cancers
5
ai-based prevention
4
prevention interval
4
cancers national
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecological cancers. Despite diagnosis and treatment advances, survival rates have not increased over the past 32 years. This study estimated and reported the global burden of ovarian cancer during the past 32 years to inform preventative and control strategies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prostate cancer remains the most frequent cancer among men, representing a significant health burden. Despite its high morbidity and mortality rates, the etiology of prostate cancer remains relatively unknown, with only non-modifiable established risk factors. Chronic inflammation has emerged as a potential factor in prostate carcinogenesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the different types of neoplasms and lineages on Sjögren syndrome (SjS) patient mortality.

Methods: Medical records review study based on the Spanish Hospital Discharge Database and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding list. The neoplasm-related deaths in SjS patients with the general population during the period 2016-2019 were compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chronic schistosomiasis causes multiple organ and multiple system diseases, especially the digestive system. Schistosome eggs are mainly deposited in the stomach, liver and colorectal, but a few eggs are deposited in the appendix and cause disease. At present, there are few studies on schistosomal appendicitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Patients with stage I colorectal cancer (CRC) rarely experience recurrence after curative resection. Therefore, the risk factors for stage I CRC recurrence are yet to be established. We aimed to identify risk factors for stage I CRC recurrence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!